314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33577108)
1. An artificial intelligence-driven agent for real-time head-and-neck IMRT plan generation using conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN).
Li X; Wang C; Sheng Y; Zhang J; Wang W; Yin FF; Wu Q; Wu QJ; Ge Y
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2714-2723. PubMed ID: 33577108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic IMRT planning via static field fluence prediction (AIP-SFFP): a deep learning algorithm for real-time prostate treatment planning.
Li X; Zhang J; Sheng Y; Chang Y; Yin FF; Ge Y; Wu QJ; Wang C
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(17):175014. PubMed ID: 32663813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insights of an AI agent via analysis of prediction errors: a case study of fluence map prediction for radiation therapy planning.
Li X; Wu QJ; Wu Q; Wang C; Sheng Y; Wang W; Stephens H; Yin FF; Ge Y
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 66(23):. PubMed ID: 34757945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study.
Wu Q; Manning M; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 10656393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic IMRT treatment planning through fluence prediction and plan fine-tuning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Cai W; Ding S; Li H; Zhou X; Dou W; Zhou L; Song T; Li Y
Radiat Oncol; 2024 Mar; 19(1):39. PubMed ID: 38509540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Liu C; Yu NY; Shan J; Bhangoo RS; Daniels TB; Chiang JS; Ding X; Lara P; Patrick CL; Archuleta JP; DeWees T; Hu Y; Schild SE; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4755-4762. PubMed ID: 31498885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using deep learning to predict beam-tunable Pareto optimal dose distribution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Bohara G; Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie A; Jiang S; Nguyen D
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3898-3912. PubMed ID: 32621789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semiautomated head-and-neck IMRT planning using dose warping and scaling to robustly adapt plans in a knowledge database containing potentially suboptimal plans.
Schmidt M; Lo JY; Grzetic S; Lutzky C; Brizel DM; Das SK
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4428-34. PubMed ID: 26233173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A plan template-based automation solution using a commercial treatment planning system.
Huang X; Quan H; Zhao B; Zhou W; Chen C; Chen Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 May; 21(5):13-25. PubMed ID: 32180351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Dosimetry analysis of intensity-modulated and conformal radiation therapy for head and neck tumors].
Pesznyák C; Béla D; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 26035156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deterministic direct aperture optimization using multiphase piecewise constant segmentation.
Nguyen D; O'Connor D; Ruan D; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5596-5609. PubMed ID: 28834556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial intelligence-based radiotherapy machine parameter optimization using reinforcement learning.
Hrinivich WT; Lee J
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6140-6150. PubMed ID: 33070336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using overlap volume histogram and IMRT plan data to guide and automate VMAT planning: a head-and-neck case study.
Wu B; Pang D; Simari P; Taylor R; Sanguineti G; McNutt T
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021714. PubMed ID: 23387737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of different IMRT boost delivery methods on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing.
Dogan N; King S; Emami B; Mohideen N; Mirkovic N; Leybovich LB; Sethi A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Dec; 57(5):1480-91. PubMed ID: 14630288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
