These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33577218)

  • 1. The Influence of Vowel Identity, Vowel Production Variability, and Consonant Environment on Envelope Following Responses.
    Easwar V; Bridgwater E; Purcell D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):662-672. PubMed ID: 33577218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of envelope following responses to vowel polarity.
    Easwar V; Beamish L; Aiken S; Choi JM; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 320():38-50. PubMed ID: 25500177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses to Spectra and Level of Preceding Phoneme Context.
    Easwar V; Boothalingam S; Wilson E
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1327-1335. PubMed ID: 35120354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-Retest Variability in the Characteristics of Envelope Following Responses Evoked by Speech Stimuli.
    Easwar V; Scollie S; Aiken S; Purcell D
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):150-164. PubMed ID: 31136317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating potential interactions between envelope following responses elicited simultaneously by different vowel formants.
    Easwar V; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():35-45. PubMed ID: 31176869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of phoneme contexts on adaptation in vowel-evoked envelope following responses.
    Easwar V; Chung L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 56(5):4572-4582. PubMed ID: 35804282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fundamental frequency-dependent changes in vowel-evoked envelope following responses.
    Easwar V; Boothalingam S; Flaherty R
    Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 408():108297. PubMed ID: 34229221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.
    Easwar V; Birstler J; Harrison A; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1732-1746. PubMed ID: 33136646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phase-locked responses to the vowel envelope vary in scalp-recorded amplitude due to across-frequency response interactions.
    Easwar V; Banyard A; Aiken SJ; Purcell DW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 48(10):3126-3145. PubMed ID: 30240514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From modulated noise to natural speech: The effect of stimulus parameters on the envelope following response.
    Van Canneyt J; Wouters J; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 393():107993. PubMed ID: 32535277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Influence of Male- and Female-Spoken Vowel Acoustics on Envelope-Following Responses.
    Easwar V; Purcell D; Eeckhoutte MV; Aiken SJ
    Semin Hear; 2022 Aug; 43(3):223-239. PubMed ID: 36313043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Sensation Level on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses.
    Easwar V; Birstler J; Harrison A; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):250-254. PubMed ID: 34260437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Infancy.
    Easwar V; Scollie S; Lasarev M; Urichuk M; Aiken SJ; Purcell DW
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211004331. PubMed ID: 34251887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability in the Estimated Amplitude of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses Caused by Assumed Neurophysiologic Processing Delays.
    Easwar V; Aiken S; Beh K; McGrath E; Galloy M; Scollie S; Purcell D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):759-769. PubMed ID: 36002663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting Hearing aid Benefit Using Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell D; Wright T
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231151468. PubMed ID: 36946195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.