167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33578199)
1. Total attenuation compensation for backscatter coefficient estimation using full angular spatial compounding.
Coila A; Rouyer J; Zenteno O; Luchies A; Oelze ML; Lavarello R
Ultrasonics; 2021 Jul; 114():106376. PubMed ID: 33578199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency dependence of attenuation and backscatter coefficient of ex vivo human lymphedema dermis.
Omura M; Yoshida K; Akita S; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31515646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regularized Spectral Log Difference Technique for Ultrasonic Attenuation Imaging.
Coila AL; Lavarello R
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Mar; 65(3):378-389. PubMed ID: 28650811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Pawlicki AD; O'Brien WD
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 23493614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental evaluation of spectral-based quantitative ultrasound imaging using plane wave compounding.
Salles S; Liebgott H; Basset O; Cachard C; Vray D; Lavarello R
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Nov; 61(11):1824-34. PubMed ID: 25389161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.
Nguyen TN; Tam AJ; Do MN; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):308-317. PubMed ID: 31567079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In Vivo Estimation of Attenuation and Backscatter Coefficients From Human Thyroids.
Rouyer J; Cueva T; Yamamoto T; Portal A; Lavarello RJ
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 26955025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation.
Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 50(6):833-842. PubMed ID: 38471999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regularized Ultrasound Phantom-Free Local Attenuation Coefficient Slope (ACS) Imaging in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Tissues.
Rafati I; Destrempes F; Yazdani L; Gesnik M; Tang A; Cloutier G
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Dec; 69(12):3338-3352. PubMed ID: 36318570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full Angle Spatial Compound of ARFI images for breast cancer detection.
González-Salido N; Medina L; Camacho J
Ultrasonics; 2016 Sep; 71():161-171. PubMed ID: 27362998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a frequency-domain ultrasonic imaging attenuation compensation technique.
Rouyer J; Varray F; Pozo E; Basset O; Cachard C; Lavarello R
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():1560-3. PubMed ID: 26736570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of differences in backscatter coefficients among four ultrasound scanners with different beamforming methods.
Omura M; Hasegawa H; Nagaoka R; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 31679096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo breast tissue backscatter measurements with 7.5- and 10-MHz transducers.
Anderson ME; Soo MS; Trahey GE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 27(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11295273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
