These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33578218)

  • 1. Characterizing phone usage while driving: Safety impact from road and operational perspectives using factor analysis.
    Kong X; Das S; Zhou H; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106012. PubMed ID: 33578218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of driver cell phone use and their influence on driving performance: A naturalistic driving study.
    Wang X; Xu R; Asmelash A; Xing Y; Lee C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105845. PubMed ID: 33120181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inclusion of phone use while driving data in predicting distraction-affected crashes.
    Guo X; Wu L; Kong X; Zhang Y
    J Safety Res; 2021 Dec; 79():321-328. PubMed ID: 34848012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is organized carpooling safer? Speeding and distracted driving behaviors from a naturalistic driving study in Brazil.
    Bastos JT; Dos Santos PAB; Amancio EC; Gadda TMC; Ramalho JA; King MJ; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():105992. PubMed ID: 33549972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mobile phone use among commercial drivers in Ghana: An important threat to road safety.
    Donkor I; Gyedu A; Edusei AK; Ebel BE; Donkor P
    Ghana Med J; 2018 Sep; 52(3):122-126. PubMed ID: 30602796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver distraction and inattention in fatal and injury crashes: Findings from in-depth road crash data.
    Wundersitz L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(7):696-701. PubMed ID: 31408358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drivers' gap acceptance behaviours at intersections: A driving simulator study to understand the impact of mobile phone visual-manual interactions.
    Li X; Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Rakotonirainy A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Apr; 138():105486. PubMed ID: 32109686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of driver distraction in tractor-trailers and motorcoach buses.
    Hammond Olson RL; Soccolich SA; Hanowski RJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():10-16. PubMed ID: 29609806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mobile phone use during driving: Effects on speed and effectiveness of driver compensatory behaviour.
    Choudhary P; Velaga NR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():370-378. PubMed ID: 28715728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "It is frustrating to not have control even though I know it's not legal!": A mixed-methods investigation on applications to prevent mobile phone use while driving.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Truelove V; King M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105412. PubMed ID: 32006729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mobile phone use while driving: Development and validation of knowledge, attitude, and practice survey instruments.
    Adeyemi OJ
    J Safety Res; 2021 Jun; 77():30-39. PubMed ID: 34092322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demographic characteristics and trends of cell phone use while driving citations in selected states in the United States, 2010-2020.
    Zhang F; Benedetti M; Chang G; Evans A; Pan Y; Shoots-Reinhard B; Zhu M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(6):788-794. PubMed ID: 38860880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the causal effects of cellphone distraction on crash risk using propensity score methods.
    Lu D; Guo F; Li F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105579. PubMed ID: 32480016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding speeding behavior from naturalistic driving data: Applying classification based association rule mining.
    Kong X; Das S; Jha K; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105620. PubMed ID: 32570086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the impact of environmental and temporal features on mobile phone distracted driving behavior using phone use data.
    Peng Y; Song G; Guo M; Wu L; Yu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106925. PubMed ID: 36512902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of curbs on traffic crash frequency on high-speed roadways.
    Jiang X; Yan X; Huang B; Richards SH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):412-21. PubMed ID: 21823949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are safety and performance affected by navigation system display size, environmental illumination, and gender when driving in both urban and rural areas?
    Yared T; Patterson P; All ESA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105585. PubMed ID: 32438091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driving impairments and duration of distractions: Assessing crash risk by harnessing microscopic naturalistic driving data.
    Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105733. PubMed ID: 32916552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.