137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33578401)
1. Improving cell seeding efficiency through modification of fiber geometry in 3D printed scaffolds.
Mainardi VL; Arrigoni C; Bianchi E; Talò G; Delcogliano M; Candrian C; Dubini G; Levi M; Moretti M
Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33578401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inlet flow rate of perfusion bioreactors affects fluid flow dynamics, but not oxygen concentration in 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Computational analysis and experimental validation.
Seddiqi H; Saatchi A; Amoabediny G; Helder MN; Abbasi Ravasjani S; Safari Hajat Aghaei M; Jin J; Zandieh-Doulabi B; Klein-Nulend J
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103826. PubMed ID: 32798924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Hollow Porous Sphere Cell Carrier for the Dynamic Three-Dimensional Cell Culture.
Gao W; Xiao L; Wang J; Mu Y; Mendhi J; Gao W; Li Z; Yarlagadda P; Wu C; Xiao Y
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2022 Nov; 28(11):610-622. PubMed ID: 36127859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perfusion cell seeding on large porous PLA/calcium phosphate composite scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor system under varying perfusion parameters.
Koch MA; Vrij EJ; Engel E; Planell JA; Lacroix D
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Dec; 95(4):1011-8. PubMed ID: 20872752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An optimized 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor for homogeneous cell seeding in bone substitute scaffolds for future chairside applications.
Engel N; Fechner C; Voges A; Ott R; Stenzel J; Siewert S; Bergner C; Khaimov V; Liese J; Schmitz KP; Krause BJ; Frerich B
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22228. PubMed ID: 34782672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An effective device and method for enhanced cell growth in 3D scaffolds: Investigation of cell seeding and proliferation under static and dynamic conditions.
Theodoridis K; Aggelidou E; Manthou ME; Keklikoglou K; Tsimponis A; Demiri E; Bakopoulou A; Mihailidis A; Kritis A
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Sep; 114():111060. PubMed ID: 32993978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fabrication of polylactic acid (PLA)-based porous scaffold through the combination of traditional bio-fabrication and 3D printing technology for bone regeneration.
Zhou X; Zhou G; Junka R; Chang N; Anwar A; Wang H; Yu X
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2021 Jan; 197():111420. PubMed ID: 33113493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D Printed Chitosan Composite Scaffold for Chondrocytes Differentiation.
Sahai N; Gogoi M; Tewari RP
Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(7):832-842. PubMed ID: 33334294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Perfusion Bioreactor System for Cell Seeding and Oxygen-Controlled Cultivation of Three-Dimensional Cell Cultures.
Schmid J; Schwarz S; Meier-Staude R; Sudhop S; Clausen-Schaumann H; Schieker M; Huber R
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2018 Oct; 24(10):585-595. PubMed ID: 30234443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. µ-Particle tracking velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics study of cell seeding within a 3D porous scaffold.
Marin AC; Grossi T; Bianchi E; Dubini G; Lacroix D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():463-469. PubMed ID: 28823900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of scaffold architecture on cell seeding efficiency: A discrete phase model CFD analysis.
Ali D
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jun; 109():62-69. PubMed ID: 31035072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the fluid environment of 3D printed gradient structure in interfacial tissue engineering.
Zhang B
Med Eng Phys; 2024 Jun; 128():104173. PubMed ID: 38789213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of cartilage regeneration on 3D collagen-polycaprolactone scaffolds: Evaluation of growth media in static and in perfusion bioreactor dynamic culture.
Theodoridis K; Aggelidou E; Manthou M; Demiri E; Bakopoulou A; Kritis A
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2019 Nov; 183():110403. PubMed ID: 31400614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering.
Hassanajili S; Karami-Pour A; Oryan A; Talaei-Khozani T
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Nov; 104():109960. PubMed ID: 31500051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suture Fiber Reinforcement of a 3D Printed Gelatin Scaffold for Its Potential Application in Soft Tissue Engineering.
Choi DJ; Choi K; Park SJ; Kim YJ; Chung S; Kim CH
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 34769034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving cell distribution on 3D additive manufactured scaffolds through engineered seeding media density and viscosity.
Cámara-Torres M; Sinha R; Mota C; Moroni L
Acta Biomater; 2020 Jan; 101():183-195. PubMed ID: 31731025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An experimental-numerical investigation on the effects of macroporous scaffold geometry on cell culture parameters.
Eghbali H; Nava MM; Leonardi G; Mohebbi-Kalhori D; Sebastiano R; Samimi A; Raimondi MT
Int J Artif Organs; 2017 May; 40(4):185-195. PubMed ID: 28430298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vascularization of Natural and Synthetic Bone Scaffolds.
Liu X; Jakus AE; Kural M; Qian H; Engler A; Ghaedi M; Shah R; Steinbacher DM; Niklason LE
Cell Transplant; 2018 Aug; 27(8):1269-1280. PubMed ID: 30008231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of customised 3D-printed bone scaffolds with different architectures.
Ntousi O; Roumpi M; Siogkas P; Deligianni D; Fotiadis DI
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.
Zhang L; Yang G; Johnson BN; Jia X
Acta Biomater; 2019 Jan; 84():16-33. PubMed ID: 30481607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
