135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33578452)
1. Does diagnostic mammography need to be a routine component of the initial evaluation of a breast symptom in women 30-39 years of age?
Neal JC; Saith S; Khong-McBride C; Kalantari BN; Ho A; Ariazand V; Ozao-Choy J; Dauphine C
Breast J; 2021 Apr; 27(4):330-334. PubMed ID: 33578452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of Diagnostic Mammography as the Primary Imaging Modality for Palpable Lumps in Women With Almost Entirely Fatty Breasts.
Linden OE; Hayward JH; Price ER; Kelil T; Joe BN; Lee AY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):938-944. PubMed ID: 32023120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of Mammography for Women 30-39 Years Old Presenting With Breast Symptoms.
Chen Y; Chou SS; Blaschke EM; Specht MC; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1416-1424. PubMed ID: 30300000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of mammography in women with focal breast complaints in addition to initial targeted ultrasound.
Appelman L; Appelman PTM; Siebers CCN; Bult P; Go HLS; Schlooz M; Mann RM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jan; 185(2):381-389. PubMed ID: 33000376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Focal breast pain: imaging evaluation and outcomes.
Owen WA; Brazeal HA; Shaw HL; Lee MV; Appleton CM; Holley SO
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():148-155. PubMed ID: 30825809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with palpable breast abnormalities and negative mammographic and sonographic findings.
Yalniz C; Campbell D; Le-Petross C; Shin K; Bevers TB; Hess KR; Whitman GJ
Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1289-1295. PubMed ID: 32108973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Focal Breast Pain: Does Breast Density Affect the Need for Ultrasound?
Cho MW; Grimm LJ; Johnson KS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27746121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Value of Mammography in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lumps in Women 30 Years Old and Older.
Brown AL; Phillips J; Slanetz PJ; Fein-Zachary V; Venkataraman S; Dialani V; Mehta TS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):935-942. PubMed ID: 28777649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New Palpable Breast Lump With Recent Negative Mammogram: Is Repeat Mammography Necessary?
Leung SE; Ben-Nachum I; Kornecki A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):200-4. PubMed ID: 27081707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In the Setting of Negative Mammogram, Is Additional Breast Ultrasound Necessary for Evaluation of Breast Pain?
Mema E; Cho E; Ryu YK; Jadeja P; Wynn R; Taback B; Ha R
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(2):117-120. PubMed ID: 29402490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. US as the Primary Imaging Modality in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses in Breastfeeding Women, Including Those of Advanced Maternal Age.
Chung M; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Knobel A; Greenwood HI; Ray KM; Joe BN; Lee AY
Radiology; 2020 Nov; 297(2):316-324. PubMed ID: 32870133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.
Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Springer P; Obrist P; Dünser M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 10511149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic Evaluation of Nigerian Women with Mammographic Focal Asymmetric Density.
Itanyi DU; Ibrahim H; Ka'alu WO
West Afr J Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):233-237. PubMed ID: 38785292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30-39 years of age.
Lehman CD; Lee CI; Loving VA; Portillo MS; Peacock S; DeMartini WB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1169-77. PubMed ID: 23096195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Invasive mammary carcinoma after immediate and short-term follow-up for lobular neoplasia on core biopsy.
Crisi GM; Mandavilli S; Cronin E; Ricci A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2003 Mar; 27(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 12604888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound detection of nonpalpable mammographically occult malignancy.
Simpson WL; Hermann G; Rausch DR; Sherman J; Feig SA; Bleiweiss IJ; Jaffer S; Port A
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2008 Apr; 59(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 18533395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of ultrasonography and digital mammography in women under 40 years with symptomatic breast cancer: a 7-year Irish experience.
Redmond CE; Healy GM; Murphy CF; O'Doherty A; Foster A
Ir J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 186(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 27271165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incremental Cancer Detection of Locoregional Restaging with Diagnostic Mammography Combined with Whole-Breast and Regional Nodal Ultrasound in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
Candelaria RP; Huang ML; Adrada BE; Bassett R; Hunt KK; Kuerer HM; Smith BD; Chavez-MacGregor M; Yang WT
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 27955877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
