These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33579384)

  • 21. External validation of acute-to-chronic models for estimation of reproductive toxicity to Daphnia magna.
    Furuhama A; Hayashi TI; Yamamoto H; Tatarazako N
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):765-781. PubMed ID: 29022371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative Analysis of QSAR-based vs. Chemical Similarity Based Predictors of GPCRs Binding Affinity.
    Luo M; Wang XS; Tropsha A
    Mol Inform; 2016 Jan; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 27491652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictive classification-based QSTR models for toxicity study of diverse pesticides on multiple avian species.
    Banjare P; Singh J; Roy PP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17992-18003. PubMed ID: 33410022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
    Mansouri K; Judson RS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Towards cheminformatics-based estimation of drug therapeutic index: Predicting the protective index of anticonvulsants using a new quantitative structure-index relationship approach.
    Chen S; Zhang P; Liu X; Qin C; Tao L; Zhang C; Yang SY; Chen YZ; Chui WK
    J Mol Graph Model; 2016 Jun; 67():102-10. PubMed ID: 27262528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In Silico Prediction of the Toxicity of Nitroaromatic Compounds: Application of Ensemble Learning QSAR Approach.
    Daghighi A; Casanola-Martin GM; Timmerman T; Milenković D; Lučić B; Rasulev B
    Toxics; 2022 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 36548579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In silico prediction of toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis by using genetic algorithm and decision tree-based modeling approach.
    Abbasitabar F; Zare-Shahabadi V
    Chemosphere; 2017 Apr; 172():249-259. PubMed ID: 28081509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Application of GA-MLR for QSAR Modeling of the Arylthioindole Class of Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitors as Anticancer Agents.
    Ahmadi S; Habibpour E
    Anticancer Agents Med Chem; 2017; 17(4):552-565. PubMed ID: 27528182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Discovery of Potent Antihypertensive Ligands Substituted Imidazolyl Biphenyl Sulfonylureas Analogs as Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor Antagonists by Molecular Modelling Studies.
    Sharma MC
    Interdiscip Sci; 2015 Sep; 7(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 26188391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examining the predictive accuracy of the novel 3D N-linear algebraic molecular codifications on benchmark datasets.
    García-Jacas CR; Contreras-Torres E; Marrero-Ponce Y; Pupo-Meriño M; Barigye SJ; Cabrera-Leyva L
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():10. PubMed ID: 26925168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. QSAR and QSPR studies of a highly structured physicochemical domain.
    Nicolotti O; Carotti A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):264-76. PubMed ID: 16426062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An ensemble model of QSAR tools for regulatory risk assessment.
    Pradeep P; Povinelli RJ; White S; Merrill SJ
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():48. PubMed ID: 28316646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis.
    Zhu H; Tropsha A; Fourches D; Varnek A; Papa E; Gramatica P; Oberg T; Dao P; Cherkasov A; Tetko IV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):766-84. PubMed ID: 18311912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of liposome/water partition coefficients predictive models for neutral and ionogenic organic chemicals.
    Lin S; Yang X; Liu H
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Sep; 179():40-49. PubMed ID: 31026749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On various metrics used for validation of predictive QSAR models with applications in virtual screening and focused library design.
    Roy K; Mitra I
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2011 Jul; 14(6):450-74. PubMed ID: 21521150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative QSAR- and fragments distribution analysis of drugs, druglikes, metabolic substances, and antimicrobial compounds.
    Karakoc E; Sahinalp SC; Cherkasov A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):2167-82. PubMed ID: 16995747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
    Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new strategy to improve the predictive ability of the local lazy regression and its application to the QSAR study of melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 antagonists.
    Li J; Li S; Lei B; Liu H; Yao X; Liu M; Gramatica P
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Apr; 31(5):973-85. PubMed ID: 19670228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Multiple Linear Regressions and Neural Networks based QSAR models for the design of new antitubercular compounds.
    Ventura C; Latino DA; Martins F
    Eur J Med Chem; 2013; 70():831-45. PubMed ID: 24246731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of prediction confidence and domain extrapolation of two structure-activity relationship models for predicting estrogen receptor binding activity.
    Tong W; Xie Q; Hong H; Shi L; Fang H; Perkins R
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Aug; 112(12):1249-54. PubMed ID: 15345371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.