These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33579521)

  • 1. Storage, transport, and disposition of gametes and embryos: legal issues and practical considerations.
    Rinehart LA
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Feb; 115(2):274-281. PubMed ID: 33579521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cryostorage failures: a medicolegal review.
    Moutos CP; Lahham R; Phelps JY
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1041-1048. PubMed ID: 31127476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cryostorage of reproductive tissues in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: a committee opinion.
    Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Reproductive Biologists and Technologists, and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Sep; 114(3):486-491. PubMed ID: 32778330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Future regulation of fertility banking in the UK.
    Hartshorne G
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2003 May; 6(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 12869787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ART of cryopreservation and its changing landscape.
    Pomeroy KO; Comizzoli P; Rushing JS; Lersten IL; Nel-Themaat L
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):469-476. PubMed ID: 35219471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Business law issues for assisted reproductive technology practices and practitioners: considerations for sales or mergers of fertility practices.
    Yanofsky RM; Hanselman TF
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Feb; 115(2):290-295. PubMed ID: 33358019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
    Bowens KK
    J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive capacity: what does the embryo get?
    Stephens KU
    South Univ Law Rev; 1997; 24(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 16528857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts.
    Triber GA
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulating reproductive technologies: panacea or paper tiger?
    Daar JF
    Houst Law Rev; 1997; 34(3):609-64. PubMed ID: 12680374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive assessment of cryogenic storage risk and quality management concerns: best practice guidelines for ART labs.
    Schiewe MC; Freeman M; Whitney JB; VerMilyea MD; Jones A; Aguirre M; Leisinger C; Adaniya G; Synder N; Chilton R; Behnke EJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jan; 36(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 30232640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction.
    Brenwald ML; Redeker K
    Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Storage of cryopreserved reproductive tissues: evidence that cross-contamination of infectious agents is a negligible risk.
    Pomeroy KO; Harris S; Conaghan J; Papadakis M; Centola G; Basuray R; Battaglia D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Sep; 94(4):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 19481743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve?
    Bredkjaer HE; Grudzinskas JG
    Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Jul; 5(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 11753534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Belgian law on medically assisted reproduction and the disposition of supernumerary embryos and gametes.
    Pennings G
    Eur J Health Law; 2007 Nov; 14(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 18229762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cryopreserved embryos: a response to "forced parenthood" and the role of intent.
    Apel SB
    Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):663-81. PubMed ID: 16610152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal Issues in Gamete and Embryo Cryopreservation: An Overview.
    Crockin SL; Gottschalk KC
    Semin Reprod Med; 2018 Sep; 36(5):299-310. PubMed ID: 30947346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Storage limits of gametes and embryos: regulation in search of policy justification.
    Stuhmcke A; Chandler E
    J Law Med; 2014 Sep; 22(1):121-35. PubMed ID: 25341323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fate of surplus embryos: ethical and emotional impacts on assisted reproduction.
    Machado CS
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2020 Jul; 24(3):310-315. PubMed ID: 32202746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experimentation with extra embryos in Spain: comment on the 45/2003 Law that modifies the 35/1988 Law on assisted reproduction techniques].
    Lacadena JR
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2004; (20):177-94. PubMed ID: 15544149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.