These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33580299)

  • 1. A Quality Assessment of the Information Accessible to Patients on the Internet About the Whipple Procedure.
    Khachfe HH; Chahrour MA; Habib JR; Yu J; Jamali FR
    World J Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 33580299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
    Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and readability assessment of online patient information on cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
    Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Hoeltzel GD; Miura JT; Aarons CB; Williams NN; Dumon KR; Karakousis GC
    J Surg Oncol; 2023 Mar; 127(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 36394434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device.
    Rouhi AD; Han JJ; Ghanem YK; Pervaiz SS; Suarez-Pierre A; Choudhury RA; Bermudez CA; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36478254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
    Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
    Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
    Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the quality of information online for arthroscopic Bankart repair.
    Shazil Jamal M; Hurley ET; Davey MS; Asad H; Gaafar M; Mullett H
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 May; 105(5):394-399. PubMed ID: 35639042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
    Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Robotic Radical Cystectomy Remains Poor: A Standardized Assessment.
    Pandolfo SD; Aveta A; Loizzo D; Crocerossa F; La Rocca R; Del Giudice F; Chung BI; Wu Z; Lucarelli G; Mirone V; Imbimbo C; Autorino R
    Urol Pract; 2022 Sep; 9(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 37145731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.
    Al-Kharouf KFK; Khan FI; Robertson GA
    World J Methodol; 2023 Dec; 13(5):439-445. PubMed ID: 38229937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information.
    McMorrow SM; Millett DT
    J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 43(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 27485895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to deep vein thrombosis.
    Qadeer MA; Kelly M; Lenehan B
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2022 Jan; 33(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 34799504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.