These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33580359)
21. Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstructions in clinical Ter Voert EEGW; Muehlematter UJ; Delso G; Pizzuto DA; Müller J; Nagel HW; Burger IA EJNMMI Res; 2018 Jul; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 30054750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET. Ahn S; Ross SG; Asma E; Miao J; Jin X; Cheng L; Wollenweber SD; Manjeshwar RM Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5733-51. PubMed ID: 26158503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size. Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Q.Clear reconstruction for reducing the scanning time for Ruan W; Qin C; Liu F; Pi R; Gai Y; Liu Q; Lan X Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jun; 50(7):1851-1860. PubMed ID: 36847826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging. Chang T; Chang G; Clark JW; Diab RH; Rohren E; Mawlawi OR Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5891-900. PubMed ID: 23039628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection on Sadeghi F; Sheikhzadeh P; Farzanehfar S; Ghafarian P; Moafpurian Y; Ay M EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Oct; 10(1):63. PubMed ID: 37843705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies. Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Phantom, clinical, and texture indices evaluation and optimization of a penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method (Q.Clear) on a BGO PET/CT scanner. Reynés-Llompart G; Gámez-Cenzano C; Vercher-Conejero JL; Sabaté-Llobera A; Calvo-Malvar N; Martí-Climent JM Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3214-3222. PubMed ID: 29782657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Y-90 PET/MR imaging optimization with a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm. Calatayud-Jordán J; Carrasco-Vela N; Chimeno-Hernández J; Carles-Fariña M; Olivas-Arroyo C; Bello-Arqués P; Pérez-Enguix D; Martí-Bonmatí L; Torres-Espallardo I Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38884672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The clinical effectiveness of reconstructing Usmani S; Ahmed N; Gnanasegaran G; Rasheed R; Marafi F; Alnaaimi M; Omar M; Musbah A; Al Kandari F; De Schepper S; Van den Wyngaert T Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20210043. PubMed ID: 33571003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared With Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights. Chilcott AK; Bradley KM; McGowan DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 29091008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of acquisition time and penalizing factor in a block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm on a Si-photomultiplier-based PET-CT system for Trägårdh E; Minarik D; Almquist H; Bitzén U; Garpered S; Hvittfelt E; Olsson B; Oddstig J EJNMMI Res; 2019 Jul; 9(1):64. PubMed ID: 31342214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimization of a dedicated protocol using a small-voxel PSF reconstruction for head-and-neck Ciappuccini R; Desmonts C; Licaj I; Blanc-Fournier C; Bardet S; Aide N EJNMMI Res; 2018 Dec; 8(1):104. PubMed ID: 30511173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reduction of [ Cox CPW; Brabander T; Vegt E; de Lussanet de la Sablonière QG; Graven LH; Verburg FA; Segbers M EJNMMI Phys; 2024 Mar; 11(1):27. PubMed ID: 38488989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection. Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance evaluation of iterative PET reconstruction with resolution recovery incorporating Gallium-68 positron range correction. Gavriilidis P; Koole M; Marinus A; Jansen FP; Deller TW; Mottaghy FM; Wierts R Med Phys; 2024 Sep; 51(9):5927-5942. PubMed ID: 38889361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]