151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33580599)
1. Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review.
Taguchi S; Morikawa T; Shibahara J; Fukuhara H
Int J Urol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):614-621. PubMed ID: 33580599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.
Pierorazio PM; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 23464824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An update of the Gleason grading system.
Epstein JI
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):433-40. PubMed ID: 20006878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model.
Taguchi S; Uemura Y; Fujimura T; Morikawa T; Naito A; Kawai T; Suzuki M; Kume H; Fukuhara H
BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):371. PubMed ID: 32357849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Mosse CA; Magi-Galluzzi C; Tsuzuki T; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Mar; 28(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 15104304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrating Tertiary Gleason 5 Patterns into Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
Sauter G; Clauditz T; Steurer S; Wittmer C; Büscheck F; Krech T; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Harms L; Lawrenz L; Möller-Koop C; Simon R; Jacobsen F; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Weidemann S; Haese A; Steuber T; Salomon G; Matiu M; Vettorazzi E; Michl U; Budäus L; Tilki D; Thederan I; Pehrke D; Beyer B; Fraune C; Göbel C; Heinrich M; Juhnke M; Möller K; Bawahab AAA; Uhlig R; Huland H; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Schlomm T
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):674-683. PubMed ID: 28117112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping.
Montironi R; Santoni M; Mazzucchelli R; Burattini L; Berardi R; Galosi AB; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Scarpelli M
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2016; 16(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 27008205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of the presence of tertiary Gleason grade 5 in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy specimens in Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Kamoda N; Ohori M; Hirasawa Y; Inoue R; Hashimoto T; Satake N; Gondo T; Nakagami Y; Nagao T; Ohno Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Mar; 49(3):276-280. PubMed ID: 30649377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer.
Wissing M; Brimo F; Chevalier S; Scarlata E; McKercher G; O'Flaherty A; Aprikian S; Thibodeau V; Saad F; Carmel M; Lacombe L; Têtu B; Ekindi-Ndongo N; Latour M; Trudel D; Aprikian A
BJU Int; 2019 Apr; 123(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 30113732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.
Treurniet KM; Trudel D; Sykes J; Evans AJ; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 24403214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current perspectives on the Gleason grading of prostate cancer.
Shah RB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Nov; 133(11):1810-6. PubMed ID: 19886716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial Comment to Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review.
Tsuzuki T
Int J Urol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):621-622. PubMed ID: 33644942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
