BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

759 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33580743)

  • 21. Contemporary Outcome Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Demal TJ; Gordon C; Bhadra OD; Linder M; Ludwig S; Grundmann D; Voigtländer L; Waldschmidt L; Schirmer J; Schofer N; Seiffert M; Blankenberg S; Reichenspurner H; Westermann D; Conradi L
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 May; 171():115-121. PubMed ID: 35307189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gozdek M; Raffa GM; Suwalski P; Kolodziejczak M; Anisimowicz L; Kubica J; Navarese EP; Kowalewski M;
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Mar; 53(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 29029105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transcatheter or Surgical Replacement for Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.
    Tran JH; Itagaki S; Zeng Q; Leon MB; O'Gara PT; Mack MJ; Gillinov AM; El-Hamamsy I; Tang GHL; Mikami T; Bagiella E; Moskowitz AJ; Adams DH; Gelijns AC; Borger MA; Egorova NN
    JAMA Cardiol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38776106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?
    Hutt E; Mehra N; Desai MY
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Dec; 20(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 36433699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with failed aortic bioprostheses.
    Silaschi M; Wendler O; Seiffert M; Castro L; Lubos E; Schirmer J; Blankenberg S; Reichenspurner H; Schäfer U; Treede H; MacCarthy P; Conradi L
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 24(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27624351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-Term Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier-Derived Data.
    Sá MP; Jacquemyn X; Serna-Gallegos D; Makani A; Kliner D; Toma C; West D; Ahmad D; Yousef S; Brown JA; Yoon P; Kaczorowski D; Bonatti J; Chu D; Sultan I
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 212():30-39. PubMed ID: 38070591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.
    Kolte D; Vlahakes GJ; Palacios IF; Sakhuja R; Passeri JJ; Inglessis I; Elmariah S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 74(12):1532-1540. PubMed ID: 31537261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
    Sardar P; Kundu A; Chatterjee S; Feldman DN; Owan T; Kakouros N; Nairooz R; Pape LA; Feldman T; Dawn Abbott J; Elmariah S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):504-515. PubMed ID: 28398671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus isolated redo surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Yousef S; Serna-Gallegos D; Iyanna N; Kliner D; Brown JA; Toma C; Makani A; West D; Wang Y; Thoma FW; Ahmad D; Yoon P; Chu D; Kaczorowski D; Bonatti J; Sultan I
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37399942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
    Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.
    Carnero-Alcázar M; Maroto LC; Cobiella-Carnicer J; Vilacosta I; Nombela-Franco L; Alswies A; Villagrán-Medinilla E; Macaya C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Apr; 51(4):644-652. PubMed ID: 28007879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes in Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve.
    Hecht S; Zenses AS; Bernard J; Tastet L; Côté N; de Freitas Campos Guimarães L; Paradis JM; Beaudoin J; O'Connor K; Bernier M; Dumont E; Kalavrouziotis D; Delarochellière R; Mohammadi S; Clavel MA; Rodés-Cabau J; Salaun E; Pibarot P
    Struct Heart; 2022 Nov; 6(6):100106. PubMed ID: 37288124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of rehabilitation outcomes for transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement as redo procedure in patients with previous cardiac surgery: Evidence based on 11 observational studies.
    Wang G; Li X; Zhang Z; Dong J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Nov; 100(45):e27657. PubMed ID: 34766568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement of Failed Surgically Implanted Bioprostheses: The STS/ACC Registry.
    Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR; Vemulapalli S; Carroll JD; Holmes DR; Mack MJ; Thourani VH; Grover FL; Brennan JM; Suri RM; Dai D; Svensson LG
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(4):370-382. PubMed ID: 30025572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transcatheter ViV Versus Redo Surgical AVR for the Management of Failed Biological Prosthesis: Early and Late Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Cohort.
    Tam DY; Dharma C; Rocha RV; Ouzounian M; Wijeysundera HC; Austin PC; Chikwe J; Gaudino M; Fremes SE
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 13(6):765-774. PubMed ID: 31954671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement or re-surgical aortic valve replacement in degenerated bioprostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and midterm results.
    Bruno F; Elia E; D'Ascenzo F; Marengo G; Deharo P; Kaneko T; Cuisset T; Fauchier L; De Filippo O; Gallone G; Andreis A; Fortuni F; Salizzoni S; La Torre M; Rinaldi M; De Ferrari GM; Conrotto F
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jul; 100(1):122-130. PubMed ID: 35485723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Al-Abdouh A; Upadhrasta S; Fashanu O; Elias H; Zhao D; Hasan RK; Michos ED
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 31447314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.