165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3358123)
1. Whistle-blowers air cases at house hearings.
Holden C
Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4851):386-7. PubMed ID: 3358123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Science police.
Dolnick E
Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
Anderson J
J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation.
Sprague RL
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):103-33. PubMed ID: 11653080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The pathology of research fraud: the history and politics of the US experience.
Lafollette MC
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 8308475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. NIH sees plagiarism in vision paper.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4914):120-2. PubMed ID: 2535671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tougher crackdown on fraud needed.
del Guercio P
Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):823. PubMed ID: 9732860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
Kaiser J; Marshall E
Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science needs vigilance not vigilantes.
Woolf PK
JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1939-40. PubMed ID: 3418857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The fraud squad.
Greenberg D
Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8682):155-6. PubMed ID: 1967443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
Friedly J
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Conduct unbecoming?
Weiss P
N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NIH finds fraud in cell paper.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1991 Mar; 251(5001):1552-4. PubMed ID: 2011731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
Taubes G
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH panel finds no fraud in Cell paper but cites errors.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4885):1499. PubMed ID: 3201234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Article brings censure recommendation.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1987 Sep; 258(9):1137. PubMed ID: 3306007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
