141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33581292)
1. Cost Analysis of Pancreaticoduodenectomy at a High-Volume Robotic Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery Program.
Rosemurgy A; Ross S; Bourdeau T; Jacob K; Thomas J; Przetocki V; Luberice K; Sucandy I
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Apr; 232(4):461-469. PubMed ID: 33581292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Readmission and Resource Use After Robotic-Assisted versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: 2010-2017.
Aguayo E; Antonios J; Sanaiha Y; Dobaria V; Kwon OJ; Sareh S; Benharash P; King JC
J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():517-524. PubMed ID: 32629334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review.
Doula C; Kostakis ID; Damaskos C; Machairas N; Vardakostas DV; Feretis T; Felekouras E
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Feb; 26(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 26836625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians.
Ross S; Sucandy I; Vasanthakumar P; Christodoulou M; Pattilachan T; Rosemurgy A
J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 38668931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost analysis of open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single institution comparison.
Mesleh MG; Stauffer JA; Bowers SP; Asbun HJ
Surg Endosc; 2013 Dec; 27(12):4518-23. PubMed ID: 23943116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the Cost for Robotic vs "Non-Robotic" Transhiatal Esophagectomy.
Ross SB; Rayman S; Thomas J; Peek G; Crespo K; Syblis C; Sucandy I; Rosemurgy A
Am Surg; 2022 Mar; 88(3):389-393. PubMed ID: 34794333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of 102 Fully Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomies: Clinical and Financial Outcomes.
Mejia A; Shah J; Vivian E; Acharya P
Pancreas; 2020; 49(5):668-674. PubMed ID: 32433405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weighing the outcomes: the role of BMI in complex robotic esophageal and hepatobiliary operations.
Rayman S; Ross SB; Sucandy I; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A
Updates Surg; 2024 Jun; 76(3):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 38460102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Combination of Robotic Approach and ERAS Pathway Optimizes Outcomes and Cost for Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kowalsky SJ; Zenati MS; Steve J; Esper SA; Lee KK; Hogg ME; Zeh HJ; Zureikat AH
Ann Surg; 2019 Jun; 269(6):1138-1145. PubMed ID: 31082913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival and Robotic Approach for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score-Match Study.
Rosemurgy AS; Ross SB; Espeut A; Nguyen D; Crespo K; Syblis C; Vasanthakumar P; Sucandy I
J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Apr; 234(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35290288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Boggi U; Signori S; De Lio N; Perrone VG; Vistoli F; Belluomini M; Cappelli C; Amorese G; Mosca F
Br J Surg; 2013 Jun; 100(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 23640668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A policy of omitting an intensive care unit stay after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and cost-effective.
Cunningham KE; Zenati MS; Petrie JR; Steve JL; Hogg ME; Zeh HJ; Zureikat AH
J Surg Res; 2016 Jul; 204(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 27451861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Financial Impact of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Costs Between the Robotic and Open Technique in a Single Institution.
Daskalaki D; Gonzalez-Heredia R; Brown M; Bianco FM; Tzvetanov I; Davis M; Kim J; Benedetti E; Giulianotti PC
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Apr; 27(4):375-382. PubMed ID: 28186429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: the results of a case-matched comparison.
Marino MV; Podda M; Gomez Ruiz M; Fernandez CC; Guarrasi D; Gomez Fleitas M
J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 31473878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective cost analysis of pancreatoduodenectomy.
Holbrook RF; Hargrave K; Traverso LW
Am J Surg; 1996 May; 171(5):508-11. PubMed ID: 8651397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.
Nassour I; Tohme S; Hoehn R; Adam MA; Zureikat AH; Alessandro P
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2248-2254. PubMed ID: 32440928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: A propensity score-weighted comparison.
Kneuertz PJ; Singer E; D'Souza DM; Abdel-Rasoul M; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Merritt RE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 May; 157(5):2018-2026.e2. PubMed ID: 30819575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy may offer improved oncologic outcomes over open surgery: a propensity-matched single-institution study.
Baimas-George M; Watson M; Murphy KJ; Iannitti D; Baker E; Ocuin L; Vrochides D; Martinie JB
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3644-3649. PubMed ID: 32328825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison of complications and cost to the open approach.
Baker EH; Ross SW; Seshadri R; Swan RZ; Iannitti DA; Vrochides D; Martinie JB
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Sep; 12(3):554-60. PubMed ID: 26202591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome and costs of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy during the initial learning curve vs laparotomy.
Tan CL; Zhang H; Peng B; Li KZ
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5311-9. PubMed ID: 25954105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
