These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33581787)

  • 1. Overestimation of carotid stenosis on CTA - Real world experience.
    Horev A; Honig A; Cohen JE; Goldbart A; Dizitzer Y; Star M; Gomori JM; Zlotnik Y; Ifergane G; Borodetsky V; Shelef I; Leker RR
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 85():36-40. PubMed ID: 33581787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Mannil M; Ramachandran J; Vittoria de Martini I; Wegener S; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Krauss B; Valavanis A; Alkadhi H; Winklhofer S
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of Computed Tomography Angiography to Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Stenosis with Real-World Assessment of Overestimation of Carotid Stenosis on Computed Tomography Angiography.
    Roy JM; Abbas R; Chong W; Muharemmi E; Hai Y; Morse C; El Naamani K; Atallah E; Herial NA; Tjoumakaris S; Gooch MR; Rosenwasser RH; Flanders A; Jabbour P
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38906473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
    Netuka D; Belšán T; Broulíková K; Mandys V; Charvát F; Malík J; Coufalová L; Bradáč O; Ostrý S; Beneš V
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
    Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations of multidetector computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury.
    Grandhi R; Weiner GM; Agarwal N; Panczykowski DM; Ares WJ; Rodriguez JS; Gelfond JA; Myers JG; Alarcon LH; Okonkwo DO; Jankowitz BT
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 128(6):1642-1647. PubMed ID: 28799874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA.
    Josephson SA; Bryant SO; Mak HK; Johnston SC; Dillon WP; Smith WS
    Neurology; 2004 Aug; 63(3):457-60. PubMed ID: 15304575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional Angiography in the Assessment of Recently Symptomatic Patients with Ipsilateral Carotid Stenosis.
    Tonetti DA; Desai SM; Nayar G; Kenmuir CL; Delfyett WT; Gross BA; Jankowitz BT; Jadhav AP; Jovin TG
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 Feb; 30(2):105487. PubMed ID: 33249340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary experience with MRA in evaluating the degree of carotid stenosis and plaque morphology using high-resolution sequences after gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist) administration: comparison with CTA and DSA.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Geiger D; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):634-47. PubMed ID: 20177976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease.
    Anderson GB; Ashforth R; Steinke DE; Ferdinandy R; Findlay JM
    Stroke; 2000 Sep; 31(9):2168-74. PubMed ID: 10978047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with three-dimensional CT angiography and surgical revascularization].
    Ohtaki M; Tanabe S; Uede T; Hashi K
    No Shinkei Geka; 1996 Nov; 24(11):995-1002. PubMed ID: 8934467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.
    Patel SG; Collie DA; Wardlaw JM; Lewis SC; Wright AR; Gibson RJ; Sellar RJ
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Jul; 73(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12082040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified calcium subtraction in dual-energy CT angiography of the lower extremity runoff: impact on diagnostic accuracy for stenosis detection.
    De Santis D; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Nance JW; Yamada RT; Thomas BA; Otani K; Jacobs BE; Turner DA; Wichmann JL; Eid M; Varga-Szemes A; Caruso D; Grant KL; Schmidt B; Vogl TJ; Laghi A; Albrecht MH
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4783-4793. PubMed ID: 30805703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Reappraisal of CT Angiography Derived Duplex Ultrasound Velocity Criteria With a Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.
    Dohring CL; Geiger JT; Motyl CM; Wang M; Stoner MC; Doyle AJ
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 Oct; 76():185-192. PubMed ID: 34153494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ultrasonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in severe carotid stenoses.
    Herzig R; Burval S; Krupka B; Vlachová I; Urbánek K; Mares J
    Eur J Neurol; 2004 Nov; 11(11):774-81. PubMed ID: 15525300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT angiography for diagnosis of carotid near-occlusion: a digital subtraction angiography validation study.
    Manrique-Zegarra M; García-Pastor A; Castro-Reyes E; Guzmán-De-Villoria JA; Herrera Herrera I; Garrido Morro I; Del Valle Diéguez M; Fortea Gil F; González Cantero J; Saura Lorente J
    Neuroradiology; 2022 Sep; 64(9):1729-1735. PubMed ID: 35729332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in grading of carotid artery stenosis in comparison with actual measurement in an in vitro model.
    Smith JC; Watkins GE; Smith DC; Palmer EW; Abou-Zamzam AM; Zhao CX; Zhang WW
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 26(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 22285345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual Energy Computed Tomography of Internal Carotid Artery: A Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal, Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Qu H; Gao Y; Li M; Zhai S; Zhang M; Lu J
    Front Neurol; 2020; 11():621202. PubMed ID: 33633659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of blunt carotid/vertebral artery injury: a note of caution.
    Malhotra AK; Camacho M; Ivatury RR; Davis IC; Komorowski DJ; Leung DA; Grizzard JD; Aboutanos MB; Duane TM; Cockrell C; Wolfe LG; Borchers CT; Martin NR
    Ann Surg; 2007 Oct; 246(4):632-42; discussion 642-3. PubMed ID: 17893500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.