These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33582764)

  • 1. Dose Setting for Dermal Absorption Studies on Dried Foliar Residues.
    Morgan N; Hewitt NJ; Felkers E; Wiemann C; Kluxen FM; Kuster CJ
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2021 May; 65(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 33582764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Vitro Method to Quantify Dermal Absorption of Pesticide Residues.
    Clarke JF; Cordery SF; Morgan NA; Knowles PK; Guy RH
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 25647690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing in vitro dermal absorption of dry residues of agrochemical sprays using human skin within OECD TG 428.
    Aggarwal M; Fisher P; Kluxen FM; Maas W; Morgan N; Parr-Dobrzanski R; Strupp C; Wiemann C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Aug; 106():55-67. PubMed ID: 31028797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dermal Absorption of Pesticide Residues.
    Clarke JF; Cordery SF; Morgan NA; Knowles PK; Guy RH
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 31(12):1356-1363. PubMed ID: 30468381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of dermal exposure to pesticide residues during re-entry.
    Belsey NA; Cordery SF; Bunge AL; Guy RH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 May; 45(10):4609-15. PubMed ID: 21510672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exposure duration and absorbed dose assessment in pesticide-exposed agricultural workers: Implications for risk assessment and modeling.
    Mandic-Rajcevic S; Rubino FM; Ariano E; Cottica D; Negri S; Colosio C
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2019 Apr; 222(3):494-502. PubMed ID: 30685193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Harvesters in strawberry fields: A literature review of pesticide exposure, an observation of their work activities, and a model for exposure prediction.
    Jiang W; Hernandez B; Richmond D; Yanga N
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 27(4):391-397. PubMed ID: 27436696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods of assessing dermal absorption with emphasis on uptake from contaminated vegetation.
    Durkin PR; Rubin L; Withey J; Meylan W
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1995; 11(1):63-79. PubMed ID: 7652752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of passive dosimetry and biomonitoring for assessing chlorpyrifos exposure in pesticide workers.
    Geer LA; Cardello N; Dellarco MJ; Leighton TJ; Zendzian RP; Roberts JD; Buckley TJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Nov; 48(8):683-95. PubMed ID: 15516344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of dermal absorption using the exponential saturation model.
    Thongsinthusak T; Ross JH; Saiz SG; Krieger RI
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Feb; 29(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 10051417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proposal for the assessment of quantitative dermal exposure limits in occupational environments: Part 1. Development of a concept to derive a quantitative dermal occupational exposure limit.
    Bos PM; Brouwer DH; Stevenson H; Boogaard PJ; de Kort WL; van Hemmen JJ
    Occup Environ Med; 1998 Dec; 55(12):795-804. PubMed ID: 9924440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pesticide residue on/in the washed skin and its potential contribution to dermal toxicity.
    Zendzian RP
    J Appl Toxicol; 2003; 23(2):121-36. PubMed ID: 12666157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability of task-based dermal exposure measurements from a variety of workplaces.
    Kromhout H; Fransman W; Vermeulen R; Roff M; van Hemmen JJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Apr; 48(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15059794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between dermal pesticide exposure by fruit harvesters and dislodgeable foliar residues.
    Zweig G; Leffingwell JT; Popendorf W
    J Environ Sci Health B; 1985 Feb; 20(1):27-59. PubMed ID: 3921591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pesticide dermal absorption: Case study x in vitro study.
    Pedon de Araujo Cardoso T; Viturino da Silva JW; Kishishita J; Galindo Bedor CN; Galindo Bedor DC; Pereira de Santana D; Bastos Leal L
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Apr; 75():103313. PubMed ID: 31865005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk assessment of dermal exposure of greenhouse workers to pesticides after re-entry.
    Brouwer R; Marquart H; de Mik G; van Hemmen JJ
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 1992 Oct; 23(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 1333747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposals for new transfer coefficient (TC) values for worker re-entry activities in grape vineyards.
    Blaschke U; Felkers E; Hewitt NJ; Kluxen FM; Morgan N; Wiemann C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Jun; 150():105628. PubMed ID: 38621523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Levels and determinants of pesticide exposure in re-entry workers in vineyards: results of the PESTEXPO study.
    Baldi I; Lebailly P; Bouvier G; Rondeau V; Kientz-Bouchart V; Canal-Raffin M; Garrigou A
    Environ Res; 2014 Jul; 132():360-9. PubMed ID: 24837246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between dietary and dislodgeable foliar (DFR) crop residues decline data; A proposed approach to refine non-dietary risk assessment.
    Badawy MH; Morgan N; Lewis KA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Dec; 127():105049. PubMed ID: 34619289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of dermal absorption factors in occupational exposure assessment: comparison of two models for agricultural reentry workers exposed to azinphosmethyl.
    Doran EM; Fenske RA; Kissel JC; Curl CL; Simcox NJ
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Sep; 18(9):669-77. PubMed ID: 12909535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.