136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33583703)
1. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance versus computed tomography angiography for renal artery stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang L; Zhu L; Li G; Zhang Y; Jiang Y; Shui B; Zhang X
J Formos Med Assoc; 2021 May; 120(5):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 33583703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of non-contrast balanced steady-state free precession megnetic resonance angiography compared to contrast-enhanced megnetic resonance angiography in diagnosing renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis.
Tao W; Shen Y; Guo L; Bo G
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(19):3483-90. PubMed ID: 25269918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis of computed tomography angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography for intracranial aneurysm.
Chen X; Liu Y; Tong H; Dong Y; Ma D; Xu L; Yang C
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 May; 97(20):e10771. PubMed ID: 29768368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of computer tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography in the stenosis detection of autologuous hemodialysis access: a meta-analysis.
Li B; Li Q; Chen C; Guan Y; Liu S
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78409. PubMed ID: 24194928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis.
Tan KT; van Beek EJ; Brown PW; van Delden OM; Tijssen J; Ramsay LE
Clin Radiol; 2002 Jul; 57(7):617-24. PubMed ID: 12096862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
Thornton J; O'Callaghan J; Walshe J; O'Brien E; Varghese JC; Lee MJ
Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(5):930-4. PubMed ID: 10369993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].
Marchand B; Hernandez-Hoyos M; Orkisz M; Douek P
J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 11148391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance urography for detecting ureteric obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen Z; Huang H; Yang J; Cai H; Yu Y
Ann Med; 2020 Sep; 52(6):275-282. PubMed ID: 32233669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for acute pulmonary embolism - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li J; Feng L; Li J; Tang J
Vasa; 2016; 45(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 27058801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective comparison of duplex ultrasonography, captopril renography, MRA, and CTA in assessing renal artery stenosis.
Eklöf H; Ahlström H; Magnusson A; Andersson LG; Andrén B; Hägg A; Bergqvist D; Nyman R
Acta Radiol; 2006 Oct; 47(8):764-74. PubMed ID: 17050355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Artery Stenosis After Kidney Transplant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Huang Y; Zhang B; Zheng J; Ma X; Zhang S; Chen Q
Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30(9):2021-2030. PubMed ID: 37076370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.
Chan YL; Leung CB; Yu SC; Yeung DK; Li PK
Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11222071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease.
Collins R; Cranny G; Burch J; Aguiar-Ibáñez R; Craig D; Wright K; Berry E; Gough M; Kleijnen J; Westwood M
Health Technol Assess; 2007 May; 11(20):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-184. PubMed ID: 17462170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis.
Vasbinder GB; Nelemans PJ; Kessels AG; Kroon AA; de Leeuw PW; van Engelshoven JM
Ann Intern Med; 2001 Sep; 135(6):401-11. PubMed ID: 11560453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The capability of inflow inversion recovery magnetic resonance compared to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance in renal artery angiography.
Xu X; Lin X; Huang J; Pan Z; Zhu X; Chen K; Zee CS; Yan F
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Oct; 42(10):2479-2487. PubMed ID: 28470403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity and specificity of optical coherence tomography angiography in the diagnosis of active choroidal neovascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang M; Gao S; Zhang Y; Zhang M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 259(12):3529-3536. PubMed ID: 34110450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic value of 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for detecting intracranial aneurysm: a meta-analysis.
HaiFeng L; YongSheng X; YangQin X; Yu D; ShuaiWen W; XingRu L; JunQiang L
Neuroradiology; 2017 Nov; 59(11):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 28887618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
