183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33584443)
1. Systematic Parameter Reviews in Cognitive Modeling: Towards a Robust and Cumulative Characterization of Psychological Processes in the Diffusion Decision Model.
Tran NH; van Maanen L; Heathcote A; Matzke D
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():608287. PubMed ID: 33584443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic models of choice.
Heathcote A; Lin YS; Reynolds A; Strickland L; Gretton M; Matzke D
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):961-985. PubMed ID: 29959755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Causal evidence in health decision making: methodological approaches of causal inference and health decision science.
Kühne F; Schomaker M; Stojkov I; Jahn B; Conrads-Frank A; Siebert S; Sroczynski G; Puntscher S; Schmid D; Schnell-Inderst P; Siebert U
Ger Med Sci; 2022; 20():Doc12. PubMed ID: 36742460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PyBEAM: A Bayesian approach to parameter inference for a wide class of binary evidence accumulation models.
Murrow M; Holmes WR
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2636-2656. PubMed ID: 37550470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probabilistic Inference: Task Dependency and Individual Differences of Probability Weighting Revealed by Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling.
Boos M; Seer C; Lange F; Kopp B
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():755. PubMed ID: 27303323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Bayesian Reformulation of the Extended Drift-Diffusion Model in Perceptual Decision Making.
Fard PR; Park H; Warkentin A; Kiebel SJ; Bitzer S
Front Comput Neurosci; 2017; 11():29. PubMed ID: 28553219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inclusion Bayes factors for mixed hierarchical diffusion decision models.
Boehm U; Evans NJ; Gronau QF; Matzke D; Wagenmakers EJ; Heathcote AJ
Psychol Methods; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37166854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Overcomplete Approach to Fitting Drift-Diffusion Decision Models to Trial-By-Trial Data.
Feltgen Q; Daunizeau J
Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():531316. PubMed ID: 33898982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A General Approach to Prior Transformation.
Segert S; Davis-Stober CP
J Math Psychol; 2019 Aug; 91():103-118. PubMed ID: 32831399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing Eight Parameter Estimation Methods for the Ratcliff Diffusion Model Using Free Software.
Alexandrowicz RW; Gula B
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():484737. PubMed ID: 33117213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic Decision Making: Learning Processes and New Research Directions.
Gonzalez C; Fakhari P; Busemeyer J
Hum Factors; 2017 Aug; 59(5):713-721. PubMed ID: 28548893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginally specified priors for non-parametric Bayesian estimation.
Kessler DC; Hoff PD; Dunson DB
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2015 Jan; 77(1):35-58. PubMed ID: 25663813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling the dynamics of recognition memory testing with an integrated model of retrieval and decision making.
Osth AF; Jansson A; Dennis S; Heathcote A
Cogn Psychol; 2018 Aug; 104():106-142. PubMed ID: 29778777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The neural implausibility of the diffusion decision model doesn't matter for cognitive psychometrics, but the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model is better.
Wang JS; Donkin C
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38743214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model.
Ratcliff R
Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):281-92. PubMed ID: 23148742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parameter Inference for Computational Cognitive Models with Approximate Bayesian Computation.
Kangasrääsiö A; Jokinen JPP; Oulasvirta A; Howes A; Kaski S
Cogn Sci; 2019 Jun; 43(6):e12738. PubMed ID: 31204797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.
Peters J; D'Esposito M
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007615. PubMed ID: 32310962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
