These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33586273)

  • 1. Automated detection of frog calls and choruses by pulse repetition rate.
    Lapp S; Wu T; Richards-Zawacki C; Voyles J; Rodriguez KM; Shamon H; Kitzes J
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1659-1668. PubMed ID: 33586273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice.
    Köhler J; Jansen M; Rodríguez A; Kok PJR; Toledo LF; Emmrich M; Glaw F; Haddad CFB; Rödel MO; Vences M
    Zootaxa; 2017 Apr; 4251(1):1-124. PubMed ID: 28609991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Acoustic Analysis of the Genus Microhyla (Anura: Microhylidae) of Sri Lanka.
    Wijayathilaka N; Meegaskumbura M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159003. PubMed ID: 27403744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae).
    Hepp F; Pombal JPJ
    Zootaxa; 2020 Jan; 4725(1):zootaxa.4725.1.1. PubMed ID: 32230594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the breeding phenology of a threatened frog species using eDNA and automatic acoustic monitoring.
    Chen Y; Tournayre O; Tian H; Lougheed SC
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14679. PubMed ID: 36710869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic characteristics of eight common Chinese anurans during the breeding season.
    Zhou YL; Qiu X; Fang XB; Yang LY; Zhao Y; Fang T; Zheng WH; Liu JS
    Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2014 Jan; 35(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 24470453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aquatic Soundscape Recordings Reveal Diverse Vocalizations and Nocturnal Activity of an Endangered Frog.
    Lapp S; Smith TC; Knapp RA; Lindauer A; Kitzes J
    Am Nat; 2024 May; 203(5):618-627. PubMed ID: 38635364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calling at the highway: The spatiotemporal constraint of road noise on Pacific chorus frog communication.
    Nelson DV; Klinck H; Carbaugh-Rutland A; Mathis CL; Morzillo AT; Garcia TS
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(1):429-440. PubMed ID: 28070305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of automated bioacoustic recorders to replace human wildlife surveys: an example using nightjars.
    Zwart MC; Baker A; McGowan PJ; Whittingham MJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102770. PubMed ID: 25029035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phylogenetic signal in the acoustic parameters of the advertisement calls of four clades of anurans.
    Gingras B; Mohandesan E; Boko D; Fitch WT
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Jul; 13():134. PubMed ID: 23815403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Boreal chorus frog (
    Brinley Buckley EM; Gottesman BL; Caven AJ; Harner MJ; Pijanowski BC
    Data Brief; 2020 Dec; 33():106581. PubMed ID: 33304970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global birdsong embeddings enable superior transfer learning for bioacoustic classification.
    Ghani B; Denton T; Kahl S; Klinck H
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22876. PubMed ID: 38129622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are frog calls relatively difficult to locate by mammalian predators?
    Jones DL; Ratnam R
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 36508005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How many years of acoustic monitoring are needed to accommodate for anuran species turnover and detection?
    Pomezanski D
    Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Aug; 193(9):553. PubMed ID: 34357459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A dataset for benchmarking Neotropical anuran calls identification in passive acoustic monitoring.
    Cañas JS; Toro-Gómez MP; Sugai LSM; Benítez Restrepo HD; Rudas J; Posso Bautista B; Toledo LF; Dena S; Domingos AHR; de Souza FL; Neckel-Oliveira S; da Rosa A; Carvalho-Rocha V; Bernardy JV; Sugai JLMM; Dos Santos CE; Bastos RP; Llusia D; Ulloa JS
    Sci Data; 2023 Nov; 10(1):771. PubMed ID: 37932332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vocal repertoire of
    Srigyan M; Samad A; Singh A; Karan J; Chandra A; Sinha PG; Kumar V; Das S; Thomas A; Suyesh R
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16903. PubMed ID: 38562993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Severe constraints for sound communication in a frog from the South American temperate forest.
    Penna M; Plaza A; Moreno-Gómez FN
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Aug; 199(8):723-33. PubMed ID: 23748250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics.
    Marques TA; Thomas L; Martin SW; Mellinger DK; Ward JA; Moretti DJ; Harris D; Tyack PL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2013 May; 88(2):287-309. PubMed ID: 23190144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vocalizations of female frogs contain nonlinear characteristics and individual signatures.
    Zhang F; Zhao J; Feng AS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174815. PubMed ID: 28358859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence of auditory insensitivity to vocalization frequencies in two frogs.
    Goutte S; Mason MJ; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; Montealegre-Z F; Chivers BD; Sarria-S FA; Antoniazzi MM; Jared C; Almeida Sato L; Felipe Toledo L
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):12121. PubMed ID: 28935936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.