204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33586366)
1. Fast Stereolithography Printing of Large-Scale Biocompatible Hydrogel Models.
Anandakrishnan N; Ye H; Guo Z; Chen Z; Mentkowski KI; Lang JK; Rajabian N; Andreadis ST; Ma Z; Spernyak JA; Lovell JF; Wang D; Xia J; Zhou C; Zhao R
Adv Healthc Mater; 2021 May; 10(10):e2002103. PubMed ID: 33586366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visible Light Photoinitiation of Cell-Adhesive Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogels for Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting.
Wang Z; Kumar H; Tian Z; Jin X; Holzman JF; Menard F; Kim K
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 Aug; 10(32):26859-26869. PubMed ID: 30024722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting.
Kumar H; Kim K
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2140():93-108. PubMed ID: 32207107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anisotropic hydrogel scaffold by flow-induced stereolithography 3D printing technique.
Mohammad Mehdipour N; Rajeev A; Kumar H; Kim K; Shor RJ; Natale G
Biomater Adv; 2024 Jul; 161():213885. PubMed ID: 38743993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D-bioprinting of aortic valve interstitial cells: impact of hydrogel and printing parameters on cell viability.
Immohr MB; Dos Santos Adrego F; Teichert HL; Schmidt V; Sugimura Y; Bauer S; Barth M; Lichtenberg A; Akhyari P
Biomed Mater; 2022 Nov; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 36322974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-Linkable Microgel Composite Matrix Bath for Embedded Bioprinting of Perfusable Tissue Constructs and Sculpting of Solid Objects.
Compaan AM; Song K; Chai W; Huang Y
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Feb; 12(7):7855-7868. PubMed ID: 31948226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting Method for Fabrication of Human Corneal Stroma Equivalent.
Mahdavi SS; Abdekhodaie MJ; Kumar H; Mashayekhan S; Baradaran-Rafii A; Kim K
Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Jul; 48(7):1955-1970. PubMed ID: 32504140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioprinted anisotropic scaffolds with fast stress relaxation bioink for engineering 3D skeletal muscle and repairing volumetric muscle loss.
Li T; Hou J; Wang L; Zeng G; Wang Z; Yu L; Yang Q; Yin J; Long M; Chen L; Chen S; Zhang H; Li Y; Wu Y; Huang W
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():21-36. PubMed ID: 36002128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D bioprinting mesenchymal stem cell-laden construct with core-shell nanospheres for cartilage tissue engineering.
Zhu W; Cui H; Boualam B; Masood F; Flynn E; Rao RD; Zhang ZY; Zhang LG
Nanotechnology; 2018 May; 29(18):185101. PubMed ID: 29446757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D bioprinting of a stem cell-laden, multi-material tubular composite: An approach for spinal cord repair.
Hamid OA; Eltaher HM; Sottile V; Yang J
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Jan; 120():111707. PubMed ID: 33545866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tunable metacrylated hyaluronic acid-based hybrid bioinks for stereolithography 3D bioprinting.
Hossain Rakin R; Kumar H; Rajeev A; Natale G; Menard F; Li ITS; Kim K
Biofabrication; 2021 Sep; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 34507314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vascular bioprinting with enzymatically degradable bioinks via multi-material projection-based stereolithography.
Thomas A; Orellano I; Lam T; Noichl B; Geiger MA; Amler AK; Kreuder AE; Palmer C; Duda G; Lauster R; Kloke L
Acta Biomater; 2020 Nov; 117():121-132. PubMed ID: 32980542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review.
Heid S; Boccaccini AR
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 113():1-22. PubMed ID: 32622053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D Printed Chitosan Composite Scaffold for Chondrocytes Differentiation.
Sahai N; Gogoi M; Tewari RP
Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(7):832-842. PubMed ID: 33334294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Designing Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA)-Based Bioinks for Visible Light Stereolithographic 3D Biofabrication.
Kumar H; Sakthivel K; Mohamed MGA; Boras E; Shin SR; Kim K
Macromol Biosci; 2021 Jan; 21(1):e2000317. PubMed ID: 33043610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inkjet-Spray Hybrid Printing for 3D Freeform Fabrication of Multilayered Hydrogel Structures.
Yoon S; Park JA; Lee HR; Yoon WH; Hwang DS; Jung S
Adv Healthc Mater; 2018 Jul; 7(14):e1800050. PubMed ID: 29708307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A fluid-supported 3D hydrogel bioprinting method.
Beh CW; Yew DS; Chai RJ; Chin SY; Seow Y; Hoon SS
Biomaterials; 2021 Sep; 276():121034. PubMed ID: 34332372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of Irgacure 2959 and lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate on cell viability, physical properties, and microstructure in 3D bioprinting of vascular-like constructs.
Xu H; Casillas J; Krishnamoorthy S; Xu C
Biomed Mater; 2020 Aug; 15(5):055021. PubMed ID: 32438356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An injectable, self-healing phenol-functionalized chitosan hydrogel with fast gelling property and visible light-crosslinking capability for 3D printing.
Liu Y; Wong CW; Chang SW; Hsu SH
Acta Biomater; 2021 Mar; 122():211-219. PubMed ID: 33444794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-throughput 3D bioprinting of corneal stromal equivalents.
Kutlehria S; Dinh TC; Bagde A; Patel N; Gebeyehu A; Singh M
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2020 Oct; 108(7):2981-2994. PubMed ID: 32386281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
