These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33586696)

  • 1. Optimal number of needle passes during EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions with 22G ProCore needles and different suction techniques: A randomized controlled trial.
    Zhou W; Li SY; Jiang H; Gao L; Li J; Kong XY; Yang L; Fang AQ; Jin ZD; Wang KX
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2021; 10(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 33586696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
    Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
    Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Alatawi A; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Chaussade S; Terris B; Barret M; Prat F
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2015 Aug; 3(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 26279842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does ProCore Fine-Needle Biopsy Really Improve the Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Pancreatic Masses?
    Delconte G; Cavalcoli F; Magarotto A; Centonze G; Bezzio C; Cattaneo L; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Bonitta G; Milione M; Enzo M
    Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 33780932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
    Mangiavillano B; Crinò SF; Facciorusso A; Di Matteo F; Barbera C; Larghi A; Rizzatti G; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Auriemma F; Fabbri C; Binda C; Coluccio C; Marocchi G; Staiano T; Conti Bellocchi MC; Bernardoni L; Eusebi LH; Cirota GG; De Nucci G; Stigliano S; Manes G; Bonanno G; Ofosu A; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Spatola F; Repici A
    Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 36044915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal sampling technique for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions using a 25-gauge ProCore needle: A multicenter randomized crossover superiority study.
    Li SY; Shi L; Yao J; Zhou W; Wang ZJ; Jiang YP; Wang XW; Zhou CH; Gao L; Jiang H; Chen Y; Li ZS; Jin ZD; Wang KX
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2022; 11(6):466-477. PubMed ID: 36537384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
    Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
    Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Armellini E; Manfrin E; Trisolini E; Andorno S; Ballarè M; Bernardoni L; Boldorini RL; Gabbrielli A; Frulloni L; Larghi A; Occhipinti P; Scarpa A; Crinò SF
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2019 Feb; 7(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 30788121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fine Needle Biopsies of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Tissue Acquisition Technique and Needle Design Do Not Impact Specimen Adequacy.
    Mendoza Ladd A; Casner N; Cherukuri SV; Garcia C; Padilla O; Dwivedi A; Hakim N
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(9):4549-4556. PubMed ID: 34859313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques.
    Schulman AR; Thompson CC; Odze R; Chan WW; Ryou M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Feb; 85(2):419-426. PubMed ID: 27530070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing per-pass performance of 2 types of needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatobiliary masses in a randomized trial.
    Mohamadnejad M; Mirzaie V; Sotoudeh M; Nikmanesh A; Hosseini R; Muthusamy R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Sep; 98(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 37098399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.