277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33587146)
1. Economic and environmental assessments of combined genetics and nutrition optimization strategies to improve the efficiency of sustainable pork production.
Soleimani T; Hermesch S; Gilbert H
J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33587146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating environmental impacts of selection for residual feed intake in pigs.
Soleimani T; Gilbert H
Animal; 2020 Dec; 14(12):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 32624079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards a methodology to formulate sustainable diets for livestock: accounting for environmental impact in diet formulation.
Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
Br J Nutr; 2016 May; 115(10):1860-74. PubMed ID: 26987378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing environmental impacts of feed using multiobjective formulation: What benefits at the farm gate for pig and broiler production?
Méda B; Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Ponchant P; Espagnol S; Wilfart A
Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100024. PubMed ID: 33750548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems.
Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3130-43. PubMed ID: 26115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental impact of replacing soybean meal with rapeseed meal in diets of finishing pigs.
van Zanten HH; Bikker P; Mollenhorst H; Meerburg BG; de Boer IJ
Animal; 2015 Nov; 9(11):1866-74. PubMed ID: 26234347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a high-fibre diet on genetic parameters of production traits in growing pigs.
Déru V; Bouquet A; Hassenfratz C; Blanchet B; Carillier-Jacquin C; Gilbert H
Animal; 2020 Nov; 14(11):2236-2245. PubMed ID: 32618545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiobjective formulation is an effective method to reduce environmental impacts of livestock feeds.
Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Espagnol S; Laisse-Redoux S; Gaudré D; Méda B; Wilfart A
Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1298-1309. PubMed ID: 30378514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a linear programming model for the optimal allocation of nutritional resources in a dairy herd.
Bellingeri A; Gallo A; Liang D; Masoero F; Cabrera VE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Nov; 103(11):10898-10916. PubMed ID: 32952013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China.
Wu H; Liu Y; Dai C; Ye Y; Zhu H; Fang W
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(14):21668-21686. PubMed ID: 38393572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetics of digestive efficiency in growing pigs fed a conventional or a high-fibre diet.
Déru V; Bouquet A; Labussière E; Ganier P; Blanchet B; Carillier-Jacquin C; Gilbert H
J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Mar; 138(2):246-258. PubMed ID: 32951296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production.
Andretta I; Hauschild L; Kipper M; Pires PGS; Pomar C
Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1990-1998. PubMed ID: 29198226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A stochastic bio-economic pig farm model to assess the impact of innovations on farm performance.
Ali BM; Berentsen PBM; Bastiaansen JWM; Oude Lansink A
Animal; 2018 Apr; 12(4):819-830. PubMed ID: 29022521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The environmental performance of different pork production scenarios: a life cycle assessment study.
Villavicencio-Gutiérrez MR; Rogers-Montoya NA; Martínez-Campos R; Gómez-Tenorio G; Martínez-Castañeda FE
Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Jan; 54(1):44. PubMed ID: 35015158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?
Leinonen I; Kyriazakis I
Proc Nutr Soc; 2016 Aug; 75(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 26935025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance.
de Quelen F; Brossard L; Wilfart A; Dourmad JY; Garcia-Launay F
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():689012. PubMed ID: 34295934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phenotypic and genetic relationships between growth and feed intake curves and feed efficiency and amino acid requirements in the growing pig.
Saintilan R; Brossard L; Vautier B; Sellier P; Bidanel J; van Milgen J; Gilbert H
Animal; 2015 Jan; 9(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 25192352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs.
Hickmann FMW; Andretta I; Létourneau-Montminy MP; Remus A; Galli GM; Vittori J; Kipper M
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():732253. PubMed ID: 34708101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of incorporating environmental cost and risk aversion on economic values of pig breeding goal traits.
Ali BM; de Mey Y; Bastiaansen JWM; Oude Lansink AGJM
J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Jun; 135(3):194-207. PubMed ID: 29878493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment.
Dourmad JY; Ryschawy J; Trousson T; Bonneau M; Gonzàlez J; Houwers HW; Hviid M; Zimmer C; Nguyen TL; Morgensen L
Animal; 2014 Dec; 8(12):2027-37. PubMed ID: 25170767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
