BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33587222)

  • 1. Comparing lesion detection efficacy and image quality across different PET system generations to optimize the iodine-124 PET protocol for recurrent thyroid cancer.
    Kersting D; Jentzen W; Sraieb M; Costa PF; Conti M; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Nader M; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Weber M
    EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 33587222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Silicon-photomultiplier-based PET/CT reduces the minimum detectable activity of iodine-124.
    Kersting D; Jentzen W; Fragoso Costa P; Sraieb M; Sandach P; Umutlu L; Conti M; Zarrad F; Rischpler C; Fendler WP; Herrmann K; Weber M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17477. PubMed ID: 34471170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study.
    Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of a dedicated protocol using a small-voxel PSF reconstruction for head-and-neck
    Ciappuccini R; Desmonts C; Licaj I; Blanc-Fournier C; Bardet S; Aide N
    EJNMMI Res; 2018 Dec; 8(1):104. PubMed ID: 30511173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The association of tumor-to-background ratios and SUVmax deviations related to point spread function and time-of-flight F18-FDG-PET/CT reconstruction in colorectal liver metastases.
    Rogasch JM; Steffen IG; Hofheinz F; Großer OS; Furth C; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Apostolova I; Amthauer H
    EJNMMI Res; 2015; 5():31. PubMed ID: 25992306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
    Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of whole-body oncologic PET with time-of-flight and point-spread function for the hybrid PET/MR system.
    Shang K; Cui B; Ma J; Shuai D; Liang Z; Jansen F; Zhou Y; Lu J; Zhao G
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():70-75. PubMed ID: 28668434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
    Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
    Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative comparison of PET performance-Siemens Biograph mCT and mMR.
    Karlberg AM; Sæther O; Eikenes L; Goa PE
    EJNMMI Phys; 2016 Dec; 3(1):5. PubMed ID: 26911722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing Radiation Exposure to Paediatric Patients Undergoing [18F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging.
    Kertész H; Beyer T; London K; Saleh H; Chung D; Rausch I; Cal-Gonzalez J; Kitsos T; Kench PL
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):775-786. PubMed ID: 33846898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
    Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-of-Flight Information Improved the Detectability of Subcentimeter Spheres Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner.
    Hashimoto N; Morita K; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 29599404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.
    Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; Brahmer A; Mavroeidi IA; Zarrad F; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Seifert R; Sraieb M; Weber M; Kersting D
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):899. PubMed ID: 35978274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
    Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
    EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
    Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.
    Kadrmas DJ; Oktay MB; Casey ME; Hamill JJ
    IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2012 Oct; 59(5):1940-1947. PubMed ID: 23293380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
    Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
    Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
    EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of [
    Weber M; Jentzen W; Hofferber R; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Conti M; Wetter A; Kersting D; Rischpler C; Fragoso Costa P
    EJNMMI Res; 2021 Feb; 11(1):21. PubMed ID: 33641046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PET optimization for improved assessment and accurate quantification of 90Y-microsphere biodistribution after radioembolization.
    Martí-Climent JM; Prieto E; Elosúa C; Rodríguez-Fraile M; Domínguez-Prado I; Vigil C; García-Velloso MJ; Arbizu J; Peñuelas I; Richter JA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092503. PubMed ID: 25186412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.