These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3358727)

  • 1. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry.
    Werner EB; Bishop KI; Koelle J; Douglas GR; LeBlanc RP; Mills RP; Schwartz B; Whalen WR; Wilensky JT
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 May; 106(5):619-23. PubMed ID: 3358727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients.
    Werner EB; Petrig B; Krupin T; Bishop KI
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 30(6):1083-9. PubMed ID: 2732022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC; Drance SM; Douglas GR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 31(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 2318590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
    Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry: Comparison of the Octopus 900 and Humphrey visual field analyzer 3 versus Goldmann perimetry.
    Bevers C; Blanckaert G; Van Keer K; Fils JF; Vandewalle E; Stalmans I
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 97(4):e499-e505. PubMed ID: 30345638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Trope GE; Britton R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence and prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensive patients.
    Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):709-15. PubMed ID: 11384565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma .
    Nouri-Mahdavi K; Brigatti L; Weitzman M; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Aug; 104(8):1228-36. PubMed ID: 9261308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D
    Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with automated threshold perimetry.
    Sommer A; Enger C; Witt K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1987 May; 103(5):681-4. PubMed ID: 3578465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
    Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peripheral visual field testing in glaucoma by automated kinetic perimetry with the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Ballon BJ; Echelman DA; Shields MB; Ollie AR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 110(12):1730-2. PubMed ID: 1463413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 8489448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients.
    Hirasawa K; Takahashi N; Satou T; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Aug; 42(8):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 28441081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in clinically stable glaucoma patients.
    Werner EB; Adelson A; Krupin T
    Ophthalmology; 1988 Jun; 95(6):764-7. PubMed ID: 3211477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cataract extraction on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1997 Dec; 115(12):1515-9. PubMed ID: 9400784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated kinetic perimetry with two peripheral isopters in glaucoma.
    Miller KN; Shields MB; Ollie AR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Sep; 107(9):1316-20. PubMed ID: 2783064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.