These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33587285)
1. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of three-port vs four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (level 1 evidence). Hajibandeh S; Finch DA; Mohamedahmed AYY; Iskandar A; Venkatesan G; Hajibandeh S; Satyadas T Updates Surg; 2021 Apr; 73(2):451-471. PubMed ID: 33587285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evans L; Sams E; Naguib A; Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 May; 407(3):937-946. PubMed ID: 35039923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Umbilical port versus epigastric port for gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. Kulkarni AA; Sharma G; Deo KB; Jain T Surgeon; 2022 Jun; 20(3):e26-e35. PubMed ID: 33888427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Poon CM; Chan KW; Lee DW; Chan KC; Ko CW; Cheung HY; Lee KW Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12874694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Single-Site Robotic and Multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center. Balachandran B; Hufford TA; Mustafa T; Kochar K; Sulo S; Khorsand J World J Surg; 2017 May; 41(5):1246-1253. PubMed ID: 28058471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lin H; Zhang J; Li X; Li Y; Su S Updates Surg; 2023 Jan; 75(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 36205830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis. Haueter R; Schütz T; Raptis DA; Clavien PA; Zuber M Br J Surg; 2017 Aug; 104(9):1141-1159. PubMed ID: 28569406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Safe and Feasible Alternative to the Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Chatterjee A; Kumar R; Chattoraj A Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52196. PubMed ID: 38347985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. Kumar M; Agrawal CS; Gupta RK JSLS; 2007; 11(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 17931519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review. Migliore M; Arezzo A; Arolfo S; Passera R; Morino M Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4716-4727. PubMed ID: 29943057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port approach for acute appendicitis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials. Zaman S; Mohamedahmed AYY; Srinivasan A; Stonelake S; Sillah AK; Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S Surgeon; 2021 Dec; 19(6):365-379. PubMed ID: 33752983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of outcomes after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in relation to patient body mass index. Jang EJ; Roh YH; Choi CJ; Kim MC; Kim KW; Choi HJ JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25516701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children. Seifarth FG; Liu MH; Ayala D; Worley S; Moslim MA JSLS; 2017; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 29026282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sun N; Zhang J; Zhang C; Shi Y Am J Surg; 2018 Dec; 216(6):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 29866396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Pietrabissa A; Pugliese L; Vinci A; Peri A; Tinozzi FP; Cavazzi E; Pellegrino E; Klersy C Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):3089-97. PubMed ID: 26497946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the fourth port routinely required for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Our three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience. Ciftci A; Yazicioglu MB; Tiryaki C; Turgut HT; Subasi O; Ilgoz M; Civil O; Yildiz SY Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 185(4):909-912. PubMed ID: 27582090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrieval of Gallbladder Via Umbilical Versus Epigastric Port Site During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Clark MC; Barratt OA; Taktak S; Subar D; Henley N Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2019 Oct; 29(5):321-327. PubMed ID: 31033631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Innovative, Cost-Effective Technique with Superior Cosmetic Outcomes. Krinalkumar M; Arun D Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():85-91. PubMed ID: 31476795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Comparison of Four-Port, Two-Port Without Suspension Suture and Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Results. Sulu B; Allahverdi TD; Altun H; Koksal N Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 26935504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]