171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33587753)
1. A novel prognostic nomogram utilizing the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer: A large multicenter study.
Tang X; Guo C; Liu S; Guo J; Hua K; Qiu J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 155(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 33587753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nomograms predicting the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer.
Feng Y; Wang Y; Xie Y; Wu S; Li Y; Li M
BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):450. PubMed ID: 33892663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculating the overall survival probability in patients with cervical cancer: a nomogram and decision curve analysis-based study.
Xie G; Wang R; Shang L; Qi C; Yang L; Huang L; Yang W; Chung MC
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):833. PubMed ID: 32873257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative platelet count improves the prognostic prediction of the FIGO staging system for operable cervical cancer patients.
Zheng RR; Huang XX; Jin C; Zhuang XX; Ye LC; Zheng FY; Lin F
Clin Chim Acta; 2017 Oct; 473():198-203. PubMed ID: 27836106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative nomogram for prediction of microscopic parametrial infiltration in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy.
Kong TW; Kim J; Son JH; Kang SW; Paek J; Chun M; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 142(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 27179979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nomograms Predicting Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Based on the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
Meng Q; Wang W; Liu X; Wang D; Zhang F
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():870670. PubMed ID: 35646645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nomogram prediction for overall survival of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer.
Polterauer S; Grimm C; Hofstetter G; Concin N; Natter C; Sturdza A; Pötter R; Marth C; Reinthaller A; Heinze G
Br J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 107(6):918-24. PubMed ID: 22871885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prognostic model using FIGO 2018 staging and MRI-derived tumor volume to predict long-term outcomes in patients with uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma who received definitive radiotherapy.
Zang L; Chen Q; Lin A; Chen J; Zhang X; Fang Y; Wang M
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):210. PubMed ID: 37475053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study.
Chen X; Duan H; Liu P; Lin L; Ni Y; Li D; Dai E; Zhan X; Li P; Huo Z; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):121. PubMed ID: 35282114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Establishing a Nomogram for Stage IA-IIB Cervical Cancer Patients after Complete Resection.
Zhou H; Li X; Zhang Y; Jia Y; Hu T; Yang R; Huang KC; Chen ZL; Wang SS; Tang FX; Zhou J; Chen YL; Wu L; Han XB; Lin ZQ; Lu XM; Xing H; Qu PP; Cai HB; Song XJ; Tian XY; Zhang QH; Shen J; Liu D; Wang ZH; Xu HB; Wang CY; Xi L; Deng DR; Wang H; Lv WG; Shen K; Wang SX; Xie X; Cheng XD; Ma D; Li S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3773-7. PubMed ID: 25987036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Mohamud A; Høgdall C; Schnack T
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):506-513. PubMed ID: 35346512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the New FIGO 2018 Staging System Allow Better Prognostic Differentiation in Early Stage Cervical Cancer? A Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study.
Ten Eikelder MLG; Hinten F; Smits A; Van der Aa MA; Bekkers RLM; IntHout J; Wenzel HHB; Zusterzeel PLM
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35804912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individualized prediction of overall survival after postoperative radiation therapy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a Korean Radiation Oncology Group study (KROG 13-03).
Lee HJ; Han S; Kim YS; Nam JH; Kim HJ; Kim JW; Park W; Kim BG; Kim JH; Cha SD; Kim J; Lee KH; Yoon MS; Kim SM; Kim JY; Yoon WS; Lee NW; Choi JH; Park SY; Kim JY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):659-64. PubMed ID: 24138914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic Nomograms Predicting Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The First Nomogram Compared With Revised FIGO 2018 Staging System.
Yang X; An J; Zhang Y; Yang Y; Chen S; Huang M; Wu L
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():591700. PubMed ID: 33194752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The prognostic role of horizontal and circumferential tumor extent in cervical cancer: Implications for the 2019 FIGO staging system.
Zyla RE; Gien LT; Vicus D; Olkhov-Mitsel E; Mirkovic J; Nofech-Mozes S; Djordjevic B; Parra-Herran C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32471646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of prognostic variables, development of predictive models, and stratification of risk groups in surgically treated FIGO early-stage (IA-IIA) carcinoma cervix.
Singh P; Tripcony L; Nicklin J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 21997176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
Liu X; Wang W; Hu K; Zhang F; Hou X; Yan J; Meng Q; Zhou Z; Miao Z; Guan H; Ma J; Shen J; Zhen H; Wang W
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):362. PubMed ID: 31941966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
