184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33588512)
1. The Effect of Background Noise on Immediate Free Recall of Words in Younger and Older Listeners with Hearing Loss.
Hwang JS; Jung Y; Lee JH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):701-707. PubMed ID: 33588512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of background babble on working memory in young and middle-aged adults.
Neidleman MT; Wambacq I; Besing J; Spitzer JB; Koehnke J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 25751691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
Hunter CR; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Noise and Serial Position on Free Recall of Spoken Words and Pupil Dilation during Encoding in Normal-Hearing Adults.
Koo M; Jeon J; Moon H; Suh M; Lee J; Oh S; Park M
Brain Sci; 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33672410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Influence of Noise Type and Semantic Predictability on Word Recall in Older Listeners and Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
Carter BL; Apoux F; Healy EW
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Sep; 65(9):3548-3565. PubMed ID: 35973100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
Wilson RH; Cates WB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
Desjardins JL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
Wilson RH; Watts KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The advantage of knowing the talker.
Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions.
Kim S; Choi I; Schwalje AT; Kim K; Lee JH
Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():395-406. PubMed ID: 32231429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Text Captioning Buffers Against the Effects of Background Noise and Hearing Loss on Memory for Speech.
Payne BR; Silcox JW; Crandell HA; Lash A; Ferguson SH; Lohani M
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 34260436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Hearing Loss and Working Memory Capacity on Context Use and Reliance on Context in Older Adults.
Shen J; Sun J; Zhang Z; Sun B; Li H; Liu Y
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):787-800. PubMed ID: 38273447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does increasing the intelligibility of a competing sound source interfere more with speech comprehension in older adults than it does in younger adults?
Lu Z; Daneman M; Schneider BA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2655-2677. PubMed ID: 27566326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
