These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33588515)
1. Korean Clear Speech Improves Speech Intelligibility for Individuals with Normal Hearing and Individuals with Hearing Loss. Shin SY; Oh H; Jin IK J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):719-724. PubMed ID: 33588515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for older adults with hearing loss. Ferguson SH J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):779-90. PubMed ID: 22223894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speaking Clearly for Older Adults With Normal Hearing: The Role of Speaking Rate. Krause JC; Panagiotopoulos AP J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3851-3859. PubMed ID: 31580758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels. Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech Intelligibility as a Cue for Acceptable Noise Levels. Recker KL; Micheyl C Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):465-474. PubMed ID: 28169839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Transparent Mask and Clear Speech Benefit Speech Intelligibility in Individuals With Hearing Loss. Yi H; Choudhury M; Hicks C J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 66(11):4558-4574. PubMed ID: 37788660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners. Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners. Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. Johnson EE; Dillon H J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of wearing face mask on speech intelligibility in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss and normal hearing sensitivity. Alkharabsheh A; Aboudi O; Abdulbaqi K; Garadat S Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):328-333. PubMed ID: 35235469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Influence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on the Relationship Between the Perception of Speech in Noise and Dysarthric Speech. Yoho SE; Barrett TS; Borrie SA J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 66(10):4025-4036. PubMed ID: 37652059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech. Krause JC; Braida LD J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3346-57. PubMed ID: 19425675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment. Başkent D; Bazo D Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Child, Young Adult, and Older Adult Talkers. Smiljanic R; Gilbert RC J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3069-3080. PubMed ID: 29075748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]