These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33588705)

  • 1. Image Analysis for Ultrasound Quality Assurance.
    Aljahdali MH; Woodman A; Al-Jamea L; Albatati SM; Williams C
    Ultrason Imaging; 2021 May; 43(3):113-123. PubMed ID: 33588705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and implementation of a quality control protocol for B-mode ultrasound equipment.
    Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Triantopoulou SS; Triantopoulou C
    J Ultrasound; 2022 Jun; 25(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 33834366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five-year evaluation of a low-cost quality assurance protocol for clinical ultrasound transducers.
    Hyldgaard N; Bolander Malvang L; Brix L
    Ultrasound; 2023 Feb; 31(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 36794120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Method for automatic detection of defective ultrasound linear array transducers based on uniformity assessment of clinical images - A case study.
    Lorentsson R; Hosseini N; Johansson JO; Rosenberg W; Stenborg B; Månsson LG; Båth M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 29322614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The analysis of in-air reverberation patterns from medical ultrasound transducers.
    Quinn T; Verma PK
    Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 27433190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated quality control of ultrasound based on in-air reverberation patterns.
    van Horssen P; Schilham A; Dickerscheid D; van der Werf N; Keijzers H; van Almere R; Kuijer J; Peters R; Hofman M
    Ultrasound; 2017 Nov; 25(4):229-238. PubMed ID: 29163659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine Ultrasound Quality Assurance in a Multi-Unit Radiology Department: A Retrospective Evaluation of Transducer Failures.
    Vitikainen AM; Peltonen JI; Vartiainen E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1930-1937. PubMed ID: 28634042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-transducer variability of ultrasound image quality in obese adults: Qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
    Maar M; Lee J; Tardi A; Zheng YY; Wong C; Gao J
    Clin Imaging; 2022 Dec; 92():63-71. PubMed ID: 36208612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound.
    Sipilä O; Mannila V; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 21144687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two-year study.
    Nowik P; Bujila R; Poludniowski G; Fransson A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):254–265. PubMed ID: 26219012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple uniformity test for ultrasound phased arrays.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1162-6. PubMed ID: 27546869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a low-cost liquid ultrasound test object for detection of transducer artefacts.
    King DM; Hangiandreou NJ; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):N557-70. PubMed ID: 21081828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Automatic Image Processing Workflow for Daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assurance.
    Peltonen JI; Mäkelä T; Sofiev A; Salli E
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):163-171. PubMed ID: 27834027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phantom-based quality assurance measurements in B-mode ultrasound.
    Mannila V; Sipilä O
    Acta Radiol Short Rep; 2013; 2(8):2047981613511967. PubMed ID: 24349715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluations of UltraiQ software for objective ultrasound image quality assessment using images from a commercial scanner.
    Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Gorny KR; Hangiandreou NJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 29336119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality control of ultrasound transducers: analysis of evaluation parameters and results of a survey of 116 transducers in a single hospital.
    Cozzolino P; Stramare R; Udilano A; Castoro M; Scagliori E; Beltrame V; Rubaltelli L
    Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):668-77. PubMed ID: 20177978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality control in breast ultrasound.
    Lagalla R; Midiri M
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 May; 27 Suppl 2():S229-33. PubMed ID: 9652527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimized Plane Wave Imaging for Fast and High-Quality Ultrasound Imaging.
    Jensen J; Stuart MB; Jensen JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Nov; 63(11):1922-1934. PubMed ID: 27824568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.