These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33589271)
1. Occlusal stress distribution and remaining crack propagation of a cracked tooth treated with different materials and designs: 3D finite element analysis. Kim SY; Kim BS; Kim H; Cho SY Dent Mater; 2021 Apr; 37(4):731-740. PubMed ID: 33589271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects on different full-coverage designs and materials of crack propagation in first mandibular molar: an extended finite element method study. Ni J; Xu L; Lin Y; Lai D; Huang X Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1222060. PubMed ID: 37650043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling. Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Magne P; Belser UC Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress intensity factor of a cracked molar restored with different materials and designs: A 3D-FEA. Jiang J; Sun J; Ma H; Wang J; Huang Z; Zhou S J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105818. PubMed ID: 37068432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The finite element analysis of stress distribution in different size of MO cavities restored with composite resin inlays]. Zhang L; Lu Y; Yang BS; Guo Y; Li FP Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 25938145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials. Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of material and loading location on stress distribution of inlays. Costa VCD; Machado AC; Soares PV; Raposo LH; Vasconcellos AB Am J Dent; 2021 Jun; 34(3):171-176. PubMed ID: 34143589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Premolar cuspal flexure as a function of restorative material and occlusal contact location. Magne P; Oganesyan T Quintessence Int; 2009 May; 40(5):363-70. PubMed ID: 19582240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution. Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in inlay-restored mandibular first molar under simultaneous thermomechanical loads. Çelik Köycü B; Imirzalioğlu P; Özden UA Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 27041006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fatigue behavior and stress distribution of molars restored with MOD inlays with and without deep margin elevation. Grassi EDA; de Andrade GS; Tribst JPM; Machry RV; Valandro LF; Ramos NC; Bresciani E; Saavedra GSFA Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2513-2526. PubMed ID: 34643807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis. Yamanel K; Caglar A; Gülsahi K; Ozden UA Dent Mater J; 2009 Nov; 28(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 20019416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elastic Properties of Lithium Disilicate Versus Feldspathic Inlays: Effect on the Bonding by 3D Finite Element Analysis. Trindade FZ; Valandro LF; de Jager N; Bottino MA; Kleverlaan CJ J Prosthodont; 2018 Oct; 27(8):741-747. PubMed ID: 27696615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis. Yang H; Park C; Shin JH; Yun KD; Lim HP; Park SW; Chung H J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 10(3):184-190. PubMed ID: 29930787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]