207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33590318)
1. Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
Arshad Z; Thahir A; Rawal J; Hull PD; Carrothers AD; Krkovic M; Chou DTS
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2021 Oct; 31(7):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 33590318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intra-operative outcomes following internal fixation with trochanteric stabilisation plate or intramedullary nail in intertrochanteric fractures.
Geetala R; Wakefield E; Bradshaw F; Zhang J; Krkovic M
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1193-1199. PubMed ID: 38008823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.
Grønhaug KML; Dybvik E; Matre K; Östman B; Gjertsen JE
Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):274-282. PubMed ID: 35094569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximal femoral nails antirotation, Gamma nails, and dynamic hip screws for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of femur: A meta-analysis.
Ma KL; Wang X; Luan FJ; Xu HT; Fang Y; Min J; Luan HX; Yang F; Zheng H; He SJ
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Dec; 100(8):859-66. PubMed ID: 25453927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hardware removal rates after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures : Nationwide trends in Finland in 1997-2016.
Ponkilainen VT; Huttunen TT; Kannus P; Mattila VM
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Aug; 140(8):1047-1054. PubMed ID: 31965281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the increased use of intramedullary nailing over DHS for intertrochanteric hip fractures justified? - A review of the Irish hip fracture database 2016 -2020.
Berney M; Moore J; Walsh M; Rowan F; Cleary M; Hurson C; Brent L
Surgeon; 2024 Feb; 22(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 37793947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.
Madsen JE; Naess L; Aune AK; Alho A; Ekeland A; Strømsøe K
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 9619458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic Hip Screw with Trochanter-Stabilizing Plate Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation as a Treatment for Unstable AO/OTA 31-A2 and 31-A3 Intertrochanteric Fractures.
Fu CW; Chen JY; Liu YC; Liao KW; Lu YC
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():1896935. PubMed ID: 32923477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants.
Panteli M; Vun JSH; West RM; Howard A; Pountos I; Giannoudis PV
J Orthop Traumatol; 2022 Jun; 23(1):27. PubMed ID: 35764711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does intramedullary nail have advantages over dynamic hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA31A1-A3? A meta-analysis.
Yu F; Tang YW; Wang J; Lin ZC; Liu YB
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jul; 24(1):588. PubMed ID: 37464358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of cerclage wiring in the management of subtrochanteric and reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Hantouly AT; Salameh M; Toubasi AA; Salman LA; Alzobi O; Ahmed AF; Ahmed G
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 May; 33(4):739-749. PubMed ID: 35377073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed proximal femoral nail antirotations or dynamic hip screw fixations for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.
Zeng X; Zhan K; Zhang L; Zeng D; Yu W; Zhang X; Zhao M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):38. PubMed ID: 28122548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is distal screw entry point associated with subtrochanteric fracture after intracapsular hip fracture fixation?
Hickey B; Jones HM; Jones S
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Apr; 84(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 24812708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of proximal femoral nail (PFN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) for the treatment of AO type A2 and A3 pertrochanteric fractures of femur.
Adeel K; Nadeem RD; Akhtar M; Sah RK; Mohy-Ud-Din I
J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 May; 70(5):815-819. PubMed ID: 32400733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
