172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33590538)
1. A simple digital image analysis system for automated Ki67 assessment in primary breast cancer.
Alataki A; Zabaglo L; Tovey H; Dodson A; Dowsett M
Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):200-209. PubMed ID: 33590538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer.
Rimm DL; Leung SCY; McShane LM; Bai Y; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Bayani J; Chang MC; Dean M; Denkert C; Enwere EK; Galderisi C; Gholap A; Hugh JC; Jadhav A; Kornaga EN; Laurinavicius A; Levenson R; Lima J; Miller K; Pantanowitz L; Piper T; Ruan J; Srinivasan M; Virk S; Wu Y; Yang H; Hayes DF; Nielsen TO; Dowsett M
Mod Pathol; 2019 Jan; 32(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 30143750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematically higher Ki67 scores on core biopsy samples compared to corresponding resection specimen in breast cancer: a multi-operator and multi-institutional study.
Acs B; Leung SCY; Kidwell KM; Arun I; Augulis R; Badve SS; Bai Y; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Bayani J; Bigras G; Blank A; Buikema H; Chang MC; Dietz RL; Dodson A; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Gutierrez C; Hartman J; Kos Z; Lænkholm AV; Laurinavicius A; Levenson RM; Mahboubi-Ardakani R; Mastropasqua MG; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Quintayo MA; Rau TT; Reinhard S; Robertson S; Salgado R; Sugie T; van der Vegt B; Viale G; Zabaglo LA; Hayes DF; Dowsett M; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL;
Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1362-1369. PubMed ID: 35729220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequential immunohistochemistry and virtual image reconstruction using a single slide for quantitative KI67 measurement in breast cancer.
Serna G; Simonetti S; Fasani R; Pagliuca F; Guardia X; Gallego P; Jimenez J; Peg V; Saura C; Eppenberger-Castori S; Ramon Y Cajal S; Terracciano L; Nuciforo P
Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():102-110. PubMed ID: 32707454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of automated Ki67 analysis to predict Oncotype DX risk-of-recurrence categories in early-stage breast cancer.
Thakur SS; Li H; Chan AMY; Tudor R; Bigras G; Morris D; Enwere EK; Yang H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0188983. PubMed ID: 29304138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative validation of the SP6 antibody to Ki67 in breast cancer.
Zabaglo L; Salter J; Anderson H; Quinn E; Hills M; Detre S; A'Hern R; Dowsett M
J Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):800-4. PubMed ID: 20671052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.
Robertson S; Acs B; Lippert M; Hartman J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 32572716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of Ki67 visual scoring app compared to eyeball estimate and digital image analysis and its prognostic significance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
Arun I; Venkatesh S; Ahmed R; Agrawal SK; Leung SCY
APMIS; 2021 Aug; 129(8):489-502. PubMed ID: 34053140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer: the utility of digital image analysis using virtual triple staining and whole slide imaging.
Hida AI; Omanovic D; Pedersen L; Oshiro Y; Ogura T; Nomura T; Kurebayashi J; Kanomata N; Moriya T
Histopathology; 2020 Sep; 77(3):471-480. PubMed ID: 32578891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on whole tissue sections in breast carcinoma.
Feng M; Deng Y; Yang L; Jing Q; Zhang Z; Xu L; Wei X; Zhou Y; Wu D; Xiang F; Wang Y; Bao J; Bu H
Diagn Pathol; 2020 May; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 32471471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of Digital Image Analysis in Assessment of Ki67 Index in Breast Cancer.
Vanderschelden RK; Jerome JA; Gonzalez D; Seigh L; Carter GJ; Clark BZ; Elishaev E; Louis Fine J; Harinath L; Jones MW; Villatoro TM; Soong TR; Yu J; Zhao C; Hartman D; Bhargava R
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2024 Jan; 32(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 37937544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between Ki67 labeling index determined using image analysis software with virtual slide system and that determined visually in breast cancer.
Maeda I; Abe K; Koizumi H; Nakajima C; Tajima S; Aoki H; Tsuchiya J; Tsuchiya S; Tsuchiya K; Shimo A; Tsugawa K; Ueno T; Tatsunami S; Takagi M
Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 26271611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance analysis of the anti-Ki67 antibody clone 30-9 for immunohistochemical staining of breast cancer.
Horii R; Tsuda H; Masuda S; Sugita H; Togashi K; Ohno S; Akiyama F
Breast Cancer; 2020 Nov; 27(6):1058-1064. PubMed ID: 32440959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration.
Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Zabaglo LA; Arun I; Badve SS; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Borgquist S; Chang MC; Dodson A; Ehinger A; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Kos Z; Laenkholm AV; Mastropasqua MG; Moriya T; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Sugie T; van der Vegt B; Viale G; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Dowsett M;
Histopathology; 2019 Aug; 75(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 31017314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital image analysis of Ki67 in hot spots is superior to both manual Ki67 and mitotic counts in breast cancer.
Stålhammar G; Robertson S; Wedlund L; Lippert M; Rantalainen M; Bergh J; Hartman J
Histopathology; 2018 May; 72(6):974-989. PubMed ID: 29220095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ki 67 assessment in breast cancer in an Egyptian population: a comparative study between manual assessment on optical microscopy and digital quantitative assessment.
Ayad E; Soliman A; Anis SE; Salem AB; Hu P; Dong Y
Diagn Pathol; 2018 Aug; 13(1):63. PubMed ID: 30153851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ki67 proliferation in core biopsies versus surgical samples - a model for neo-adjuvant breast cancer studies.
Romero Q; Bendahl PO; Klintman M; Loman N; Ingvar C; Rydén L; Rose C; Grabau D; Borgquist S
BMC Cancer; 2011 Aug; 11():341. PubMed ID: 21819622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An international study to increase concordance in Ki67 scoring.
Polley MY; Leung SC; Gao D; Mastropasqua MG; Zabaglo LA; Bartlett JM; McShane LM; Enos RA; Badve SS; Bane AL; Borgquist S; Fineberg S; Lin MG; Gown AM; Grabau D; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Moriya T; Ohi Y; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Porter PL; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Lænkholm AV; Viale G; Dowsett M; Hayes DF; Nielsen TO
Mod Pathol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):778-86. PubMed ID: 25698062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
