These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33590577)

  • 1. The human-in-the-loop: an evaluation of pathologists' interaction with artificial intelligence in clinical practice.
    Bodén ACS; Molin J; Garvin S; West RA; Lundström C; Treanor D
    Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):210-218. PubMed ID: 33590577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.
    Zhong F; Bi R; Yu B; Yang F; Yang W; Shui R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150505. PubMed ID: 26928407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving Ki67 assessment concordance by the use of an artificial intelligence-empowered microscope: a multi-institutional ring study.
    Cai L; Yan K; Bu H; Yue M; Dong P; Wang X; Li L; Tian K; Shen H; Zhang J; Shang J; Niu S; Han D; Ren C; Huang J; Han X; Yao J; Liu Y
    Histopathology; 2021 Oct; 79(4):544-555. PubMed ID: 33840132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility and Prognostic Potential of Ki-67 Proliferation Index when Comparing Digital-Image Analysis with Standard Semi-Quantitative Evaluation in Breast Cancer.
    Ács B; Madaras L; Kovács KA; Micsik T; Tőkés AM; Győrffy B; Kulka J; Szász AM
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2018 Jan; 24(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 28401450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital immunohistochemistry wizard: image analysis-assisted stereology tool to produce reference data set for calibration and quality control.
    Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 25565221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Free digital image analysis software helps to resolve equivocal scores in HER2 immunohistochemistry.
    Helin HO; Tuominen VJ; Ylinen O; Helin HJ; Isola J
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Feb; 468(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 26493985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ki67 reproducibility using digital image analysis: an inter-platform and inter-operator study.
    Acs B; Pelekanou V; Bai Y; Martinez-Morilla S; Toki M; Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL
    Lab Invest; 2019 Jan; 99(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 30181553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
    Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated imaging analysis of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry on whole slide images of cell blocks from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.
    Shaker N; Shen R; Limbach AL; Satturwar S; Kobalka P; Ahmadian S; Sun S; Chen W; Lujan G; Esnakula A; Parwani A; Li Z
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2024; 13(3):205-212. PubMed ID: 38433072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequential immunohistochemistry and virtual image reconstruction using a single slide for quantitative KI67 measurement in breast cancer.
    Serna G; Simonetti S; Fasani R; Pagliuca F; Guardia X; Gallego P; Jimenez J; Peg V; Saura C; Eppenberger-Castori S; Ramon Y Cajal S; Terracciano L; Nuciforo P
    Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():102-110. PubMed ID: 32707454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods.
    Tang LH; Gonen M; Hedvat C; Modlin IM; Klimstra DS
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Dec; 36(12):1761-70. PubMed ID: 23026928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the effect of different techniques for measurement of Ki67 proliferation on reproducibility and prognosis prediction accuracy in breast cancer.
    Gudlaugsson E; Skaland I; Janssen EA; Smaaland R; Shao Z; Malpica A; Voorhorst F; Baak JP
    Histopathology; 2012 Dec; 61(6):1134-44. PubMed ID: 22963617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential Pitfalls in Diagnostic Digital Image Analysis: Experience with Ki-67 and PHH3 in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
    Hacking SM; Sajjan S; Lee L; Ziemba Y; Angert M; Yang Y; Jin C; Chavarria H; Kataria N; Jain S; Nasim M
    Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Mar; 216(3):152753. PubMed ID: 31761497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of Ki67 visual scoring app compared to eyeball estimate and digital image analysis and its prognostic significance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Arun I; Venkatesh S; Ahmed R; Agrawal SK; Leung SCY
    APMIS; 2021 Aug; 129(8):489-502. PubMed ID: 34053140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison Between Manual and Automated Assessment of Ki-67 in Breast Carcinoma: Test of a Simple Method in Daily Practice.
    Catteau X; Zindy E; Bouri S; Noël JC; Salmon I; Decaestecker C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2023; 22():15330338231169603. PubMed ID: 37559526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and Variability of Ki-67 Digital Image Analysis Methods for Clinical Diagnostics in Breast Cancer.
    Dawe M; Shi W; Liu TY; Lajkosz K; Shibahara Y; Gopal NEK; Geread R; Mirjahanmardi S; Wei CX; Butt S; Abdalla M; Manolescu S; Liang SB; Chadwick D; Roehrl MHA; McKee TD; Adeoye A; McCready D; Khademi A; Liu FF; Fyles A; Done SJ
    Lab Invest; 2024 May; 104(5):100341. PubMed ID: 38280634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and digital assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer tissue - a comparison of methods.
    Skjervold AH; Pettersen HS; Valla M; Opdahl S; Bofin AM
    Diagn Pathol; 2022 May; 17(1):45. PubMed ID: 35524221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.
    Luchini C; Pantanowitz L; Adsay V; Asa SL; Antonini P; Girolami I; Veronese N; Nottegar A; Cingarlini S; Landoni L; Brosens LA; Verschuur AV; Mattiolo P; Pea A; Mafficini A; Milella M; Niazi MK; Gurcan MN; Eccher A; Cree IA; Scarpa A
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Jun; 35(6):712-720. PubMed ID: 35249100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Ki67 dilemma: investigating prognostic cut-offs and reproducibility for automated Ki67 scoring in breast cancer.
    Rewcastle E; Skaland I; Gudlaugsson E; Fykse SK; Baak JPA; Janssen EAM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Aug; 207(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 38797793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.