BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33591020)

  • 1. Rationale, Methodological Quality, and Reporting of Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine: A Systematic Review.
    Cook DJ; Rutherford WB; Scales DC; Adhikari NKJ; Cuthbertson BH
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Jun; 49(6):977-987. PubMed ID: 33591020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?
    Mansouri A; Cooper B; Shin SM; Kondziolka D
    J Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 124(2):558-68. PubMed ID: 26315006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review showed that stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials often did not reach their planned sample size.
    Eichner FA; Groenwold RHH; Grobbee DE; Oude Rengerink K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 107():89-100. PubMed ID: 30458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological challenges in pragmatic trials in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Opportunities for improvement.
    Taljaard M; Li F; Qin B; Cui C; Zhang L; Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Mitchell SL
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 34841910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality of reporting in cluster randomised crossover trials: proposal for reporting items and an assessment of reporting quality.
    Arnup SJ; Forbes AB; Kahan BC; Morgan KE; McKenzie JE
    Trials; 2016 Dec; 17(1):575. PubMed ID: 27923384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adherence to key recommendations for design and analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: A review of trials published 2016-2022.
    Nevins P; Ryan M; Davis-Plourde K; Ouyang Y; Pereira Macedo JA; Meng C; Tong G; Wang X; Ortiz-Reyes L; Caille A; Li F; Taljaard M
    Clin Trials; 2024 Apr; 21(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 37990575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.
    Thompson JA; Fielding K; Hargreaves J; Copas A
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):639-647. PubMed ID: 28797179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014.
    Beard E; Lewis JJ; Copas A; Davey C; Osrin D; Baio G; Thompson JA; Fielding KL; Omar RZ; Ononge S; Hargreaves J; Prost A
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():353. PubMed ID: 26278881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.
    Strech D; Soltmann B; Weikert B; Bauer M; Pfennig A
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1214-21. PubMed ID: 21294992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis and reporting of stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: synthesis and critical appraisal of published studies, 2010 to 2014.
    Davey C; Hargreaves J; Thompson JA; Copas AJ; Beard E; Lewis JJ; Fielding KL
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():358. PubMed ID: 26278667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of the cluster randomized crossover design in clinical trials: protocol for a systematic review.
    Arnup SJ; Forbes AB; Kahan BC; Morgan KE; McDonald S; McKenzie JE
    Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; 3():86. PubMed ID: 25115725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appropriate statistical methods were infrequently used in cluster-randomized crossover trials.
    Arnup SJ; Forbes AB; Kahan BC; Morgan KE; McKenzie JE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():40-50. PubMed ID: 26633599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving Power and Sample Size Calculation in Rehabilitation Trial Reports: A Methodological Assessment.
    Castellini G; Gianola S; Bonovas S; Moja L
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1195-201. PubMed ID: 26971671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Illustrating problems faced by stroke researchers: a review of cluster-randomized controlled trials.
    Sutton CJ; Watkins CL; Dey P
    Int J Stroke; 2013 Oct; 8(7):566-74. PubMed ID: 23088304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic review finds major deficiencies in sample size methodology and reporting for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin J; Taljaard M; Girling A; Hemming K
    BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e010166. PubMed ID: 26846897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available.
    Barker D; McElduff P; D'Este C; Campbell MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():69. PubMed ID: 27267471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials.
    Taljaard M; Goldstein CE; Giraudeau B; Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Hey SP; Brehaut JC; Jairath V; London AJ; Eldridge SM; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 32367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.