322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33591058)
1. Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators.
Zivich PN; Breskin A
Epidemiology; 2021 May; 32(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 33591058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AIPW: An R Package for Augmented Inverse Probability-Weighted Estimation of Average Causal Effects.
Zhong Y; Kennedy EH; Bodnar LM; Naimi AI
Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 190(12):2690-2699. PubMed ID: 34268567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding and diagnosing the potential for bias when using machine learning methods with doubly robust causal estimators.
Bahamyirou A; Blais L; Forget A; Schnitzer ME
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1637-1650. PubMed ID: 29717941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
Schuler MS; Rose S
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenges in Obtaining Valid Causal Effect Estimates with Machine Learning Algorithms.
Naimi AI; Mishler AE; Kennedy EH
Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 34268558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data.
Díaz I; van der Laan MJ
Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3807-3819. PubMed ID: 28744883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the robustness of targeted maximum likelihood estimators via realistic simulations in nutrition intervention trials.
Li H; Rosete S; Coyle J; Phillips RV; Hejazi NS; Malenica I; Arnold BF; Benjamin-Chung J; Mertens A; Colford JM; van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(12):2132-2165. PubMed ID: 35172378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating population treatment effects from a survey subsample.
Rudolph KE; Díaz I; Rosenblum M; Stuart EA
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 180(7):737-48. PubMed ID: 25190679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonparametric inverse-probability-weighted estimators based on the highly adaptive lasso.
Ertefaie A; Hejazi NS; van der Laan MJ
Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1029-1041. PubMed ID: 35839293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Causal inference for recurrent event data using pseudo-observations.
Su CL; Platt RW; Plante JF
Biostatistics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 32432686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variance estimation for the average treatment effects on the treated and on the controls.
Matsouaka RA; Liu Y; Zhou Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):389-403. PubMed ID: 36476035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I.
van der Laan MJ
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 2. PubMed ID: 21969992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. G-computation and doubly robust standardisation for continuous-time data: A comparison with inverse probability weighting.
Chatton A; Borgne FL; Leyrat C; Foucher Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Apr; 31(4):706-718. PubMed ID: 34861799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Introduction to computational causal inference using reproducible Stata, R, and Python code: A tutorial.
Smith MJ; Mansournia MA; Maringe C; Zivich PN; Cole SR; Leyrat C; Belot A; Rachet B; Luque-Fernandez MA
Stat Med; 2022 Jan; 41(2):407-432. PubMed ID: 34713468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
