169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33591870)
1. Monozygotic twins: Identical or distinguishable for science and law?
Turrina S; Bortoletto E; Giannini G; De Leo D
Med Sci Law; 2021 Jan; 61(1_suppl):62-66. PubMed ID: 33591870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of the perpetrator among identical twins using next-generation sequencing technology: A case report.
Yuan L; Chen X; Liu Z; Liu Q; Song A; Bao G; Wei G; Zhang S; Lu J; Wu Y
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102167. PubMed ID: 31605960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finding the needle in the haystack: differentiating "identical" twins in paternity testing and forensics by ultra-deep next generation sequencing.
Weber-Lehmann J; Schilling E; Gradl G; Richter DC; Wiehler J; Rolf B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():42-6. PubMed ID: 24528578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiating between monozygotic twins through next-generation mitochondrial genome sequencing.
Wang Z; Zhu R; Zhang S; Bian Y; Lu D; Li C
Anal Biochem; 2015 Dec; 490():1-6. PubMed ID: 26327617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application Progress of Massively Parallel Sequencing Technology in STR Genetic Marker Detection.
Tao RY; Dong XY; Chen AQ; Lü YH; Zhang SH; Li CT
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 38(2):267-279. PubMed ID: 35899518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increasing the reach of forensic genetics with massively parallel sequencing.
Budowle B; Schmedes SE; Wendt FR
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2017 Sep; 13(3):342-349. PubMed ID: 28631109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From next generation sequencing to now generation sequencing in forensics.
de Knijff P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():175-180. PubMed ID: 30419516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Epigenetics and its new progress in monozygotic twins].
Li CT; Zhao SM; Li L
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 25(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 19697783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Massively parallel sequencing techniques for forensics: A review.
Bruijns B; Tiggelaar R; Gardeniers H
Electrophoresis; 2018 Nov; 39(21):2642-2654. PubMed ID: 30101986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Massively parallel sequencing of 17 commonly used forensic autosomal STRs and amelogenin with small amplicons.
Kim EH; Lee HY; Yang IS; Jung SE; Yang WI; Shin KJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():1-7. PubMed ID: 26799314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mono- and dizygotic twins in forensic paternity testing in practice at the Department of Forensic Medicine (Silesian Academy of Medicine, Katowice) in the years 1996-2003].
Raczek E
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2004; 54(2-3):107-15. PubMed ID: 15495555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA typing from skeletal remains: a comparison between capillary electrophoresis and massively parallel sequencing platforms.
Liu Z; Gao L; Zhang J; Fan Q; Chen M; Cheng F; Li W; Shi L; Zhang X; Zhang J; Zhang G; Yan J
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):2029-2035. PubMed ID: 32507908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Massively parallel sequence data of 31 autosomal STR loci from 496 Spanish individuals revealed concordance with CE-STR technology and enhanced discrimination power.
Barrio PA; Martín P; Alonso A; Müller P; Bodner M; Berger B; Parson W; Budowle B;
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():49-55. PubMed ID: 31252251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Highly accurate mtGenome haplotypes from long-read SMRT sequencing can distinguish between monozygotic twins.
Chen L; Wang J; Tan L; Lu C; Fu G; Fu L; Zhang X; Wang Q; Ma C; Cong B; Li S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102306. PubMed ID: 32438082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distinguishing genetically between the germlines of male monozygotic twins.
Krawczak M; Budowle B; Weber-Lehmann J; Rolf B
PLoS Genet; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1007756. PubMed ID: 30571769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Paternity testing using massively parallel sequencing and the PowerSeq™ AUTO/Y system for short tandem repeat sequencing.
S B S Silva D; Sawitzki FR; Scheible MKR; Bailey SF; S Alho C; Faith SA
Electrophoresis; 2018 Nov; 39(21):2669-2673. PubMed ID: 30132945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrimination of monozygotic twins using mtDNA heteroplasmy through probe capture enrichment and massively parallel sequencing.
Zhong Y; Zeng K; Adnan A; Li YZ; Hou XK; Pan Y; Li A; Zhu XM; Lv P; Du Z; Yang Y; Yao J
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Sep; 137(5):1337-1345. PubMed ID: 37270462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Next generation sequencing (NGS): a golden tool in forensic toolkit.
Aly SM; Sabri DM
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2015; 65(4):260-71. PubMed ID: 27543959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Introductory Overview of Open-Source and Commercial Software Options for the Analysis of Forensic Sequencing Data.
Huszar TI; Gettings KB; Vallone PM
Genes (Basel); 2021 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 34828345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Massively parallel sequencing of forensic STRs: Considerations of the DNA commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) on minimal nomenclature requirements.
Parson W; Ballard D; Budowle B; Butler JM; Gettings KB; Gill P; Gusmão L; Hares DR; Irwin JA; King JL; Knijff P; Morling N; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Neste CV; Willuweit S; Phillips C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():54-63. PubMed ID: 26844919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
