162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33592326)
1. Effects of the lining material, thickness and coverage on residual stress of class II molar restorations by multilayer technique.
Sun T; Shao B; Liu Z
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Apr; 202():105995. PubMed ID: 33592326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of internal angle and shape of the lining on residual stress of Class II molar restorations.
Zuo Q; Li A; Teng H; Liu Z
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Apr; 27(5):680-688. PubMed ID: 38229450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Di Rienzo A; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 31395448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
Kowalczyk P
Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a liner under different bulk-fill resin composites: 3D GAP formation analysis by x-ray microcomputed tomography.
Oglakci B; Kazak M; Donmez N; Dalkilic EE; Koymen SS
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190042. PubMed ID: 31778443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of dental restoration depth, internal cavity angle, and material properties on biomechanical resistance of a treated molar tooth.
Babaei B; Cella S; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105305. PubMed ID: 35700676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress relieving behaviour of flowable composite liners: A finite element analysis.
Anatavara S; Sitthiseripratip K; Senawongse P
Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 27251991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment.
Bicalho AA; de Souza SJ; de Rosatto CM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal integrity in minimally invasive molar resin composite restorations: Impact of polymerization shrinkage.
Weimann D; Fleck C; Razi H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Jul; 155():106554. PubMed ID: 38676971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-response optimisation analysis of material properties in dental restorative composites under the influence of thermal and thermomechanical stimuli - A 3D finite element study.
Thadathil Varghese J; Islam F; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106363. PubMed ID: 38169207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of Shrinkage and Viscosity of Flowable Composite Liners on Cervical Microleakage of Class II Restorations: A Micro-CT Analysis.
Nie J; Yap AU; Wang XY
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):656-664. PubMed ID: 30142038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
