These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33593345)

  • 21. The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study.
    Kim KJ; Kim G
    Korean J Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 32(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 32130851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of students' prior clinical skills and context characteristics on mini-CEX scores in clerkships--a multilevel analysis.
    Rogausch A; Beyeler C; Montagne S; Jucker-Kupper P; Berendonk C; Huwendiek S; Gemperli A; Himmel W
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Nov; 15():208. PubMed ID: 26608836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improved clinical communication OSCE scores after simulation-based training: Results of a comparative study.
    Nuzzo A; Tran-Dinh A; Courbebaisse M; Peyre H; Plaisance P; Matet A; Ranque B; Faye A; de Lastours V;
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238542. PubMed ID: 32886733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Standardised clients as assessors in a veterinary communication OSCE: a reliability and validity study.
    Artemiou E; Adams CL; Hecker KG; Vallevand A; Violato C; Coe JB
    Vet Rec; 2014 Nov; 175(20):509. PubMed ID: 25170035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of first-year veterinary students' clinical skills using objective structured clinical examinations.
    Hecker K; Read EK; Vallevand A; Krebs G; Donszelmann D; Muelling CK; Freeman SL
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 21135408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.
    Zimmermann P; Kadmon M
    GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc40. PubMed ID: 32685668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating communication skills in the OSCE format: reliability and generalizability.
    Hodges B; Turnbull J; Cohen R; Bienenstock A; Norman G
    Med Educ; 1996 Jan; 30(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 8736187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores.
    Brannick MT; Erol-Korkmaz HT; Prewett M
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1181-9. PubMed ID: 21988659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exploring the introduction of entrustment rating scales in an existing objective structured clinical examination.
    Holzhausen Y; Maaz A; März M; Sehy V; Peters H
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Aug; 19(1):319. PubMed ID: 31438938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Progress testing: is there a role for the OSCE?
    Pugh D; Touchie C; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 48(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 24807438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sequential Objective Structured Clinical Examination based on item response theory in Iran.
    Hejri SM; Jalili M
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():19. PubMed ID: 28881560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Innovative Evaluation in Fundamental Nursing Curriculum for Novice Nursing Students: An Observational Research.
    Shen L; Zeng H; Jin X; Yang J; Shang S; Zhang Y
    J Prof Nurs; 2018; 34(5):412-416. PubMed ID: 30243698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of the 5-item doctor-patient communication competency instrument for medical students (DPCC-MS) using two years of assessment data.
    Renaud JS; Côté L
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 17(1):189. PubMed ID: 29073899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
    Chesser AM; Laing MR; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Brittenden J; Heys SD
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 15271042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does student performance on preclinical OSCEs relate to clerkship grades?
    Chima M; Dallaghan GB
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():31724. PubMed ID: 27340087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs.
    Harasym PH; Woloschuk W; Cunning L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):617-32. PubMed ID: 17610034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incorporating the human touch: piloting a curriculum for patient-centered electronic health record use.
    Lee WW; Alkureishi ML; Wroblewski KE; Farnan JM; Arora VM
    Med Educ Online; 2017; 22(1):1396171. PubMed ID: 29103366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The development of a six-station OSCE for evaluating the clinical competency of the student nurses before graduation: A validity and reliability analysis.
    Lee KC; Ho CH; Yu CC; Chao YF
    Nurse Educ Today; 2020 Jan; 84():104247. PubMed ID: 31689585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does a Rater's Professional Background Influence Communication Skills Assessment?
    Artemiou E; Hecker KG; Adams CL; Coe JB
    J Vet Med Educ; 2015; 42(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 26315214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An objective structured clinical exam to measure intrinsic CanMEDS roles.
    Kassam A; Cowan M; Donnon T
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():31085. PubMed ID: 27637267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.