These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33594409)

  • 1. Reflection on modern methods: building causal evidence within high-dimensional molecular epidemiological studies of moderate size.
    Ponsonby AL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 50(3):1016-1029. PubMed ID: 33594409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reflection on modern methods: causal inference considerations for heterogeneous disease etiology.
    Nevo D; Ogino S; Wang M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 50(3):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 33484125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Negative control exposure studies in the presence of measurement error: implications for attempted effect estimate calibration.
    Sanderson E; Macdonald-Wallis C; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 47(2):587-596. PubMed ID: 29088358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.
    Hernán MA; Robins JM
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Jul; 60(7):578-86. PubMed ID: 16790829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using compartmental models to simulate directed acyclic graphs to explore competing causal mechanisms underlying epidemiological study data.
    Havumaki J; Eisenberg MC
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Jun; 17(167):20190675. PubMed ID: 32574536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary: Causal Inference for Social Exposures.
    Kaufman JS
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2019 Apr; 40():7-21. PubMed ID: 30601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causal inference based on counterfactuals.
    Höfler M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Sep; 5():28. PubMed ID: 16159397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Familial confounding or measurement error? How to interpret findings from sibling and co-twin control studies.
    Gustavson K; Torvik FA; Davey Smith G; Røysamb E; Eilertsen EM
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 39(6):587-603. PubMed ID: 38879863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The control outcome calibration approach for causal inference with unobserved confounding.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 24363326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative controls: a tool for detecting confounding and bias in observational studies.
    Lipsitch M; Tchetgen Tchetgen E; Cohen T
    Epidemiology; 2010 May; 21(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 20335814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Causal analysis approaches in epidemiology].
    Dumas O; Siroux V; Le Moual N; Varraso R
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2014 Feb; 62(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 24388738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modernizing the Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causal relationships in observational data.
    Cox LA
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 48(8):682-712. PubMed ID: 30433840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A nontechnical explanation of the counterfactual definition of confounding.
    Bours MJL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():91-100. PubMed ID: 32068101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measured and accounted-for confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: Some thoughts for practitioners.
    Roy J; Mitra N
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2021 Mar; 30(3):277-282. PubMed ID: 33372303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal Diagrams: Pitfalls and Tips.
    Suzuki E; Shinozaki T; Yamamoto E
    J Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):153-162. PubMed ID: 32009103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compound treatments and transportability of causal inference.
    Hernán MA; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2011 May; 22(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 21399502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation.
    Genbäck M; de Luna X
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 30430543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of counterfactual theory in causal reasoning.
    Maldonado G
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):681-682. PubMed ID: 27641317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Probe variables: a tool for identification of unmeasured confounders in an observational study].
    Hong X; Yin JC; Wang B
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 42(4):735-739. PubMed ID: 34814460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The tale wagged by the DAG: broadening the scope of causal inference and explanation for epidemiology.
    Krieger N; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1787-1808. PubMed ID: 27694566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.