These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33594673)

  • 21. Comparison of CBCT-based dose calculation methods in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: from Hounsfield unit to density calibration curve to deep learning.
    Barateau A; De Crevoisier R; Largent A; Mylona E; Perichon N; Castelli J; Chajon E; Acosta O; Simon A; Nunes JC; Lafond C
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4683-4693. PubMed ID: 32654160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cone-beam CT-derived relative stopping power map generation via deep learning for proton radiotherapy.
    Harms J; Lei Y; Wang T; McDonald M; Ghavidel B; Stokes W; Curran WJ; Zhou J; Liu T; Yang X
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4416-4427. PubMed ID: 32579710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
    Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accurate proton treatment planning for pencil beam crossing titanium fixation implants.
    Righetto R; Clemens LP; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Algranati C; Tommasino F; Dionisi F; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M; Farace P
    Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():28-38. PubMed ID: 31954210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automated Monte Carlo Simulation of Proton Therapy Treatment Plans.
    Verburg JM; Grassberger C; Dowdell S; Schuemann J; Seco J; Paganetti H
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Dec; 15(6):NP35-NP46. PubMed ID: 26596915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
    Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
    Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical Validation of a Ray-Casting Analytical Dose Engine for Spot Scanning Proton Delivery Systems.
    Younkin JE; Morales DH; Shen J; Shan J; Bues M; Lentz JM; Schild SE; Stoker JB; Ding X; Liu W
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819887182. PubMed ID: 31755362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning.
    Barragán Montero AM; Souris K; Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):846-862. PubMed ID: 29159915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical examination of proton pencil beam scanning on a moving anthropomorphic lung phantom.
    Wang P; Tang S; Taylor PA; Cummings DE; Janson M; Traneus E; Sturgeon JD; Lee AK; Chang C
    Med Dosim; 2019 Summer; 44(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 29759487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New capabilities of the Monte Carlo dose engine ARCHER-RT: Clinical validation of the Varian TrueBeam machine for VMAT external beam radiotherapy.
    Adam DP; Liu T; Caracappa PF; Bednarz BP; Xu XG
    Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2537-2549. PubMed ID: 32175615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A dose calculation algorithm with correction for proton-nucleus interactions in non-water materials for proton radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Inaniwa T; Kanematsu N; Sato S; Kohno R
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(1):67-89. PubMed ID: 26611641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of an extended Macro Monte Carlo method for efficient and accurate dose calculation in magnetic fields.
    Kueng R; Guyer G; Volken W; Frei D; Stabel F; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P; Fix MK
    Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6519-6530. PubMed ID: 33075168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
    Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
    Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.
    Perl J; Shin J; Schumann J; Faddegon B; Paganetti H
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6818-37. PubMed ID: 23127075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.