138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33594696)
1. A consequentialist ethical analysis of federal funding of elective abortions.
Gleeson EI; Guerrini CJ
Bioethics; 2021 May; 35(4):331-336. PubMed ID: 33594696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The courts and elective abortions under Medicaid.
Mendelson JE; Domolky S
Soc Serv Rev; 1980 Mar; 54(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 10297796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 12347485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High court urged to reject Colorado appeal of finding that it must fund rape and incest survivors' abortions.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Nov; 4(20):2. PubMed ID: 12320281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colorado rejects regulations to limit Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 May; 3(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 12319329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures.
Kalivoda P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utah's ban on abortion coverage for low-income women challenged.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Feb; 4(3):2. PubMed ID: 12319148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Federal court rules on Hyde Amendment in Michigan case.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jul; 3(14):2. PubMed ID: 12287944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Medicaid cutoff and abortion services for the poor.
Henshaw SK; Wallisch LS
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(4):171-2, 177-80. PubMed ID: 6386517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Illinois v. United States Department of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 772():329-35. PubMed ID: 11648364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In spite of ban, U.S. funds 1,000 abortions a week.
Rich S; Dugger CW
Washington Post; 1980 Aug; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11647327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. State of Georgia v. Heckler.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 768():1293-9. PubMed ID: 11648354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinton would end ban on aid to poor seeking abortions.
Toner R
N Y Times Web; 1993 Mar; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. State Medicaid abortion policies continue to be challenged; courts reach varying conclusions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 12309465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Michigan v. Engler.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D.
Fed Suppl; 1994 Jul; 860():406-10. PubMed ID: 11648413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Doe v. Mathews.
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
Fed Suppl; 1976 Oct; 422():141-7. PubMed ID: 11648360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion.
Trussell J; Menken J; Lindheim BL; Vaughan B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):120-3, 127-30. PubMed ID: 6995147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Publicly funded abortions in FY 1980 and FY 1981.
Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 6811313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Graham.
U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
Fed Suppl; 1995 Jun; 892():1379-85. PubMed ID: 11648421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
