138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33594696)
21. Hope Medical Group for Women v. Edwards.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1998 Sep; 63():418-29. PubMed ID: 11648424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. States needn't fund elective abortions for low-income women, Justices rule.
Wall St J (East Ed); 1977 Jun; ():2. PubMed ID: 11649051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
Corns CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Minnesota court overturns ban on Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jun; 3(12):3. PubMed ID: 12345511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Department of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Dec; 723():1114-20. PubMed ID: 11648344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions.
Gunty S
Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. After the Hyde Amendment: public funding for abortion in FY 1978.
Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 6995148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hern v. Beye.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Fed Report; 1995 Jun; 57():906-13. PubMed ID: 11648418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A mystery caller evaluation of Medicaid staff responses about state coverage of abortion care.
Dennis A; Blanchard K
Womens Health Issues; 2012 Mar; 22(2):e143-8. PubMed ID: 22154890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Little Rock Division
Fed Suppl; 1994 Jul; 860():609-31. PubMed ID: 11648416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Hyde Amendment in action. How did the restriction of federal funds for abortion affect low-income women?
Cates W
JAMA; 1981 Sep; 246(10):1109-12. PubMed ID: 7021885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Orr v. Nelson.
U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
Fed Suppl; 1994 Nov; 902():1019-22. PubMed ID: 11648423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds.
Klassel D
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.
Roberts SC; Gould H; Kimport K; Weitz TA; Foster DG
Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(2):e211-8. PubMed ID: 24630423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The association of federal Medicaid abortion funding restrictions with adverse obstetric outcomes among United States Medicaid recipients.
Rodriguez MI; Meath THA; Daly A; Watson K; John McConnell K
Contraception; 2023 Oct; 126():110116. PubMed ID: 37453656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. States rebel against Federal abortion orders.
Kent C; Tokarski C
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10132602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
