These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33595260)

  • 1. Predictors of Superior Recovery Kinetics in Adult Cervical Deformity Correction: An Analysis Using a Novel Area Under the Curve Methodology.
    Pierce KE; Passias PG; Brown AE; Bortz CA; Alas H; Lafage R; Lafage V; Ames C; Burton DC; Hart R; Hamilton K; Gum J; Scheer J; Daniels A; Bess S; Soroceanu A; Klineberg E; Shaffrey C; Line B; Schwab FA; Smith JS;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 May; 46(9):559-566. PubMed ID: 33595260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the combined occurrence of poor clinical and radiographic outcomes following cervical deformity corrective surgery.
    Horn SR; Passias PG; Oh C; Lafage V; Lafage R; Smith JS; Line B; Anand N; Segreto FA; Bortz CA; Scheer JK; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Mummaneni PV; Daniels AH; Park P; Nunley PD; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Feb; 32(2):182-190. PubMed ID: 31675700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery.
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Imbo B; Passfall L; Krol O; Joujon-Roche R; Williamson T; Moattari K; Tretiakov P; Adenwalla A; Chern I; Alas H; Bortz CA; Brown AE; Vira S; Diebo BG; Sciubba DM; Lafage R; Lafage V
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2022; 13(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 35386250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. At What Point Should the Thoracolumbar Region Be Addressed in Patients Undergoing Corrective Cervical Deformity Surgery?
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Naessig S; Ahmad W; Passfall L; Lafage R; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Daniels A; Eastlack R; Klineberg E; Line B; Mummaneni P; Hart R; Burton D; Bess S; Schwab F; Shaffrey C; Smith JS; Ames CP;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Oct; 46(20):E1113-E1118. PubMed ID: 34559752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Imbo B; Krol O; Passfall L; Tretiakov P; Moattari K; Williamson T; Joujon-Roche R; Passano B; Ahmad W; Naessig S; Diebo B
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(4):401-405. PubMed ID: 35068823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Passano B; Tariq MB; Ahmad S; Singh V; Owusu-Sarpong S; Krol O; Imbo B; Passfall L; Tretiakov P; Williamson T; Joujon-Roche R; Ahmad W; Naessig S; Diebo B
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(4):376-380. PubMed ID: 35068819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovery kinetics following spinal deformity correction: a comparison of isolated cervical, thoracolumbar, and combined deformity morphometries.
    Passias PG; Segreto FA; Lafage R; Lafage V; Smith JS; Line BG; Scheer JK; Mundis GM; Hamilton DK; Kim HJ; Horn SR; Bortz CA; Diebo BG; Vira S; Gupta MC; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP; Bess S;
    Spine J; 2019 Aug; 19(8):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 30930292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Despite worse baseline status depressed patients achieved outcomes similar to those in nondepressed patients after surgery for cervical deformity.
    Poorman GW; Passias PG; Horn SR; Frangella NJ; Daniels AH; Hamilton DK; Kim H; Sciubba D; Diebo BG; Bortz CA; Segreto FA; Kelly MP; Smith JS; Neuman BJ; Shaffrey CI; LaFage V; LaFage R; Ames CP; Hart R; Mundis GM; Eastlack R;
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E10. PubMed ID: 29191101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnitude of preoperative cervical lordotic compensation and C2-T3 angle are correlated to increased risk of postoperative sagittal spinal pelvic malalignment in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.
    Passias PG; Soroceanu A; Scheer J; Yang S; Boniello A; Smith JS; Protopsaltis T; Kim HJ; Schwab F; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Mundis G; Lafage R; Hart R; Shaffrey C; Lafage V; Ames C;
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1756-63. PubMed ID: 25862507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvement in some Ames-ISSG cervical deformity classification modifier grades may correlate with clinical improvement.
    Horn SR; Passias PG; Passfall L; Lafage R; Smith JS; Poorman GW; Steinmetz LM; Bortz CA; Segreto FA; Diebo B; Hart R; Burton D; Shaffrey CI; Sciubba DM; Klineberg EO; Protopsaltis TS; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Lafage V; Ames C;
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 89():297-304. PubMed ID: 34119284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients.
    Pierce KE; Passias PG; Brown AE; Bortz CA; Alas H; Lafage R; Krol O; Chou D; Burton DC; Line B; Klineberg E; Hart R; Gum J; Daniels A; Hamilton K; Bess S; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Schwab FA; Smith JS; Lafage V; Ames C;
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(3):311-317. PubMed ID: 34729000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Patient Frailty Status Influence Recovery Following Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity?: An Analysis of Patients With 3-Year Follow-up.
    Pierce KE; Passias PG; Alas H; Brown AE; Bortz CA; Lafage R; Lafage V; Ames C; Burton DC; Hart R; Hamilton K; Kelly M; Hostin R; Bess S; Klineberg E; Line B; Shaffrey C; Mummaneni P; Smith JS; Schwab FA;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Apr; 45(7):E397-E405. PubMed ID: 31651683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients.
    Pierce KE; Passias PG; Brown AE; Bortz CA; Alas H; Passfall L; Krol O; Kummer N; Lafage R; Chou D; Burton DC; Line B; Klineberg E; Hart R; Gum J; Daniels A; Hamilton K; Bess S; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Schwab FA; Smith JS; Lafage V; Ames C;
    Neurospine; 2021 Sep; 18(3):506-514. PubMed ID: 34610683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of postoperative neurologic complications on recovery kinetics in cervical deformity surgery.
    Passias PG; Brown AE; Alas H; Pierce KE; Bortz CA; Diebo B; Lafage R; Lafage V; Burton DC; Hart R; Kim HJ; Bess S; Moattari K; Joujon-Roche R; Krol O; Williamson T; Tretiakov P; Imbo B; Protopsaltis TS; Shaffrey C; Schwab F; Eastlack R; Line B; Klineberg E; Smith J; Ames C;
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 35068822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Importance of C2 Slope, a Singular Marker of Cervical Deformity, Correlates With Patient-reported Outcomes.
    Protopsaltis TS; Ramchandran S; Tishelman JC; Smith JS; Neuman BJ; Jr GMM; Lafage R; Klineberg EO; Hamilton DK; LaFage V; Gupta MC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Burton DC; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Feb; 45(3):184-192. PubMed ID: 31513111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a Novel Cervical Deformity Surgical Invasiveness Index.
    Passias PG; Horn SR; Soroceanu A; Oh C; Ailon T; Neuman BJ; Lafage V; Lafage R; Smith JS; Line B; Bortz CA; Segreto FA; Brown A; Alas H; Pierce KE; Eastlack RK; Sciubba DM; Protopsaltis TS; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Jan; 45(2):116-123. PubMed ID: 31361727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fatty infiltration of the cervical extensor musculature, cervical sagittal balance, and clinical outcomes: An analysis of operative adult cervical deformity patients.
    Passias PG; Segreto FA; Horn SR; Lafage V; Lafage R; Smith JS; Naessig S; Bortz C; Klineberg EO; Diebo BG; Sciubba DM; Neuman BJ; Hamilton DK; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Nunley P; Ames CP;
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 72():134-141. PubMed ID: 31926664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?
    Passfall L; Williamson TK; Krol O; Lebovic J; Imbo B; Joujon-Roche R; Tretiakov P; Dangas K; Owusu-Sarpong S; Koller H; Schoenfeld AJ; Diebo BG; Vira S; Lafage R; Lafage V; Passias PG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Sep; 37(3):368-375. PubMed ID: 35426823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoperative alignment goals for distinctive sagittal morphotypes of severe cervical deformity to achieve optimal improvements in health-related quality of life measures.
    Virk S; Passias P; Lafage R; Klineberg E; Mundis G; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Bess S; Burton D; Hart R; Kim HJ; Ames C; Schwab F; Smith J; Lafage V;
    Spine J; 2020 Aug; 20(8):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 32209421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.