These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 335961)
41. Letter: Novel inoculum replication device for antibiotic agar plate dilutions. Wasilauskas BL; Stallings RA J Infect Dis; 1974 Apr; 129(4):477-8. PubMed ID: 4593874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of the agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for determination of teicoplanin MICs. Kenny MT; Dulworth JK; Brackman MA J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1409-10. PubMed ID: 2526821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Differences in vancomycin MIC among MRSA isolates by agar dilution and E test method. Tandel K; Praharaj AK; Kumar S Indian J Med Microbiol; 2012; 30(4):453-5. PubMed ID: 23183472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of spiral gradient and conventional agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Wexler HM; Molitoris E; Jashnian F; Finegold SM Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1991 Jun; 35(6):1196-202. PubMed ID: 1929262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. In vitro activity of josamycin against aerobic gram-positive cocci and anaerobes. Westerman EL; Williams TW; Moreland N Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jun; 9(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 7189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. In vitro antibacterial activity of norfloxacin (MK-0366). King A; Warren C; Shannon K; Phillips I Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Apr; 21(4):604-7. PubMed ID: 6211139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A rapid method for determination of in vitro susceptibility to antibiotics with a bulk acoustic wave bacterial growth biosensor. Tan H; Le D; Li J; Wei W; Yao S Lett Appl Microbiol; 1998 Jul; 27(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 9722998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. An increase in the antimicrobial activity in vitro of fosfomycin under anaerobic conditions. Inouye S; Watanabe T; Tsuruoka T; Kitasato I J Antimicrob Chemother; 1989 Nov; 24(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 2599990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by two methods of inoculum preparation. Bourgault AM; Lamothe F J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1060-4. PubMed ID: 6520217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Disk susceptibility testing of slow-growing anaerobic bacteria. Kwok YY; Tally FP; Sutter VL; Finegold SM Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1137353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Determination of the ID50 values of antibacterial agents in agar. Kato T; Kurashige S; Chabbert YA; Mitsuhashi S J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1978 Dec; 31(12):1299-303. PubMed ID: 368001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of broth microdilution, E Test, and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Luber P; Bartelt E; Genschow E; Wagner J; Hahn H J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Mar; 41(3):1062-8. PubMed ID: 12624030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. EUCAST Definitive Document E.DEF 3.1, June 2000: Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution. European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Dieases (ESCMID) Clin Microbiol Infect; 2000 Sep; 6(9):509-15. PubMed ID: 11168187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Development of EUCAST disk diffusion method for susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Nagy E; Justesen US; Eitel Z; Urbán E; Anaerobe; 2015 Feb; 31():65-71. PubMed ID: 25464140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Susceptibility of Brazilian staphylococcal strains to glycopeptides evaluated by different testing methods. Ferreira Nunes AP; Martins Teixeira L; Reis Bastos CC; de Souza Fonseca L; Netto dos Santos KR Curr Microbiol; 2002 Jun; 44(6):385-90. PubMed ID: 12000986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Performances of Mueller-Hinton agars prepared by three manufacturers. Barry AL; Effinger LJ Am J Clin Pathol; 1974 Jul; 62(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 4366183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The amount of agar in antimicrobic disk susceptibility test plates. Barry AL; Fay GD Am J Clin Pathol; 1973 Feb; 59(2):196-8. PubMed ID: 4631582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Antibacterial activity of chemotherapeutic drugs against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Campbell O; Gagnon J; Rubin JE Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Nov; 69(5):353-357. PubMed ID: 31508840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Sensitivity of clinical bacterial strains to dioxidine in vitro under aerobic and anaerobic conditions]. Ponomareva TR Antibiot Med Biotekhnol; 1987 Mar; 32(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 3579247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]