185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33596458)
1. External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb.
Snell KIE; Archer L; Ensor J; Bonnett LJ; Debray TPA; Phillips B; Collins GS; Riley RD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 135():79-89. PubMed ID: 33596458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.
Riley RD; Debray TPA; Collins GS; Archer L; Ensor J; van Smeden M; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4230-4251. PubMed ID: 34031906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome.
Riley RD; Collins GS; Ensor J; Archer L; Booth S; Mozumder SI; Rutherford MJ; van Smeden M; Lambert PC; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(7):1280-1295. PubMed ID: 34915593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a continuous outcome.
Archer L; Snell KIE; Ensor J; Hudda MT; Collins GS; Riley RD
Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(1):133-146. PubMed ID: 33150684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kreuzberger N; Damen JA; Trivella M; Estcourt LJ; Aldin A; Umlauff L; Vazquez-Montes MD; Wolff R; Moons KG; Monsef I; Foroutan F; Kreuzer KA; Skoetz N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD012022. PubMed ID: 32735048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of required sample size for external validation of risk models for binary outcomes.
Pavlou M; Qu C; Omar RZ; Seaman SR; Steyerberg EW; White IR; Ambler G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2187-2206. PubMed ID: 33881369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II - binary and time-to-event outcomes.
Riley RD; Snell KI; Ensor J; Burke DL; Harrell FE; Moons KG; Collins GS
Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(7):1276-1296. PubMed ID: 30357870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between statistical power and predictor distribution in multilevel logistic regression: a simulation-based approach.
Olvera Astivia OL; Gadermann A; Guhn M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 31072299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External validation of prognostic models predicting pre-eclampsia: individual participant data meta-analysis.
Snell KIE; Allotey J; Smuk M; Hooper R; Chan C; Ahmed A; Chappell LC; Von Dadelszen P; Green M; Kenny L; Khalil A; Khan KS; Mol BW; Myers J; Poston L; Thilaganathan B; Staff AC; Smith GCS; Ganzevoort W; Laivuori H; Odibo AO; Arenas Ramírez J; Kingdom J; Daskalakis G; Farrar D; Baschat AA; Seed PT; Prefumo F; da Silva Costa F; Groen H; Audibert F; Masse J; Skråstad RB; Salvesen KÅ; Haavaldsen C; Nagata C; Rumbold AR; Heinonen S; Askie LM; Smits LJM; Vinter CA; Magnus P; Eero K; Villa PM; Jenum AK; Andersen LB; Norman JE; Ohkuchi A; Eskild A; Bhattacharya S; McAuliffe FM; Galindo A; Herraiz I; Carbillon L; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Yeo SA; Browne JL; Moons KGM; Riley RD; Thangaratinam S;
BMC Med; 2020 Nov; 18(1):302. PubMed ID: 33131506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of hyperparameter tuning procedures for clinical prediction models: A simulation study.
Dunias ZS; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Boulesteix AL; van Smeden M
Stat Med; 2024 Mar; 43(6):1119-1134. PubMed ID: 38189632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simulation study of sample size demonstrated the importance of the number of events per variable to develop prediction models in clustered data.
Wynants L; Bouwmeester W; Moons KG; Moerbeek M; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1406-14. PubMed ID: 25817942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample sizes of prediction model studies in prostate cancer were rarely justified and often insufficient.
Collins SD; Peek N; Riley RD; Martin GP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():53-60. PubMed ID: 33383128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.
van Smeden M; Moons KG; de Groot JA; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2455-2474. PubMed ID: 29966490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic models for predicting relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder in adults.
Moriarty AS; Meader N; Snell KI; Riley RD; Paton LW; Chew-Graham CA; Gilbody S; Churchill R; Phillips RS; Ali S; McMillan D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013491. PubMed ID: 33956992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.
Teare MD; Dimairo M; Shephard N; Hayman A; Whitehead A; Walters SJ
Trials; 2014 Jul; 15():264. PubMed ID: 24993581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical approach to determine sample size for building logistic prediction models using high-throughput data.
Son DS; Lee D; Lee K; Jung SH; Ahn T; Lee E; Sohn I; Chung J; Park W; Huh N; Lee JW
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():355-62. PubMed ID: 25555898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multivariate meta-analysis of individual participant data helped externally validate the performance and implementation of a prediction model.
Snell KI; Hua H; Debray TP; Ensor J; Look MP; Moons KG; Riley RD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():40-50. PubMed ID: 26142114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Penalization and shrinkage methods produced unreliable clinical prediction models especially when sample size was small.
Riley RD; Snell KIE; Martin GP; Whittle R; Archer L; Sperrin M; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Apr; 132():88-96. PubMed ID: 33307188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine Learning Can be Used to Predict Function but Not Pain After Surgery for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis.
Loos NL; Hoogendam L; Souer JS; Slijper HP; Andrinopoulou ER; Coppieters MW; Selles RW;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jul; 480(7):1271-1284. PubMed ID: 35042837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
