These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. A discussion of medical malpractice and cesarean section. Berkman H Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Apr; (170):9-30. PubMed ID: 10125422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Contingency fees: victim or contributing cause of medical malpractice reform acts? Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc. Reames JE Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1989 Jul; (125):7-31. PubMed ID: 10293925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Brain damage to infant--caused by water intoxication or the improper administration of anesthesia--malpractice? Direct examination of plaintiff's medical expert. Part I. Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; Annual(0):303-44. PubMed ID: 4422219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Regionalization in obstetrics from the forensic viewpoint]. Roemer VM Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7959309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Legal topics in gynecology and obstetrics. A legal case]. Ulsenheimer K Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Mar; 52(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 1597279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The five hottest issues in malpractice. Hirsh H Physicians Manage; 1987 Oct; 27(10):102-4, 106-8. PubMed ID: 10286110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The obstetrical dilemma. Avery JK J Ark Med Soc; 2005 Dec; 102(6):156-7. PubMed ID: 16381401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Brain damage to infant--caused by water intoxication or the improper administration of anesthesia--malpractice? II. Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; 20(4):431-72. PubMed ID: 4839868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of the threat of medical malpractice litigation and other factors on birth outcomes. Sloan FA; Whetten-Goldstein K; Githens PB; Entman SS Med Care; 1995 Jul; 33(7):700-14. PubMed ID: 7596209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does pertussis vaccine cause brain damage? Brahams D Lancet; 1986 May; 1(8492):1284. PubMed ID: 2872428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical malpractice claims in obstetrics and gynaecology: comparisons between the United States and Britain. Quam L; Dingwall R; Fenn P Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 95(5):454-61. PubMed ID: 3401431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Neonatal NP's line perforated atrium: radiogist held liable. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Oct; 49(5):1. PubMed ID: 19004166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Obstetrics from the forensic viewpoint exemplified by breech presentation]. Hickl EJ Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):184-90. PubMed ID: 7959303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]