These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3359744)

  • 1. Determination of upper arm muscle and fat areas using electrical impedance measurements.
    Brown BH; Karatzas T; Nakielny R; Clarke RG
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Feb; 9(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 3359744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Body composition assessed on the basis of arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness: a new index validated in children by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rolland-Cachera MF; Brambilla P; Manzoni P; Akrout M; Sironi S; Del Maschio A; Chiumello G
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Jun; 65(6):1709-13. PubMed ID: 9174464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upper arm measurements of healthy neonates comparing ultrasonography and anthropometric methods.
    Pereira-da-Silva L; Veiga Gomes J; Clington A; Videira-Amaral JM; Bustamante SA
    Early Hum Dev; 1999 Mar; 54(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 10213290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status.
    Frisancho AR
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1981 Nov; 34(11):2540-5. PubMed ID: 6975564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arm muscle plus bone area: anthropometry and CAT scan compared.
    Forbes GB; Brown MR; Griffiths HJ
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1988 Jun; 47(6):929-31. PubMed ID: 3376908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of an anthropometric estimate of the muscle and bone area in a transversal cross-section of the arm.
    de Koning FL; Binkhorst RA; Kauer JM; Thijssen HO
    Int J Sports Med; 1986 Oct; 7(5):246-9. PubMed ID: 3793331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonography as a method of nutritional assessment.
    Chiba T; Lloyd DA; Bowen A; Condon-Meyers A
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1989; 13(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 2691712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arm fat and muscle areas in infancy.
    Sann L; Durand M; Picard J; Lasne Y; Bethenod M
    Arch Dis Child; 1988 Mar; 63(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 3355205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference values for arm muscle area, arm fat area, subscapular skinfold thickness, and sum of skinfold thicknesses for American adults.
    Bishop CW
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1984; 8(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 6541716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Near infra-red interactance for nutritional assessment of dialysis patients.
    Kalantar-Zadeh K; Dunne E; Nixon K; Kahn K; Lee GH; Kleiner M; Luft FC
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 Jan; 14(1):169-75. PubMed ID: 10052499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anthropometrics revisited.
    Bastow MD
    Proc Nutr Soc; 1982 Sep; 41(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 6817334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of bone width in malnourished children under 5, and its inter relationship with mid arm muscle thickness, subcutaneous fat thickness and the mid upper arm girth.
    Khare M; Shrivastava DK; Puliyel JM
    Indian J Pediatr; 1992; 59(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 1398849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
    Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body fat of older adult subjects calculated from bioelectric impedance versus anthropometry correlated but did not agree.
    Aghdassi E; Tam C; Liu B; McArthur M; McGeer A; Simor A; Allard JP
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 Oct; 101(10):1209-12. PubMed ID: 11678496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of the measurement of the circumference of arm, arm muscle area and skinfold thickness during puberty.
    Derman O; Yalcin SS; Kanbur NO; Kinik E
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2002; 14(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12467194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impedance index or standard anthropometric measurements, which is the better variable for predicting fat-free mass in sick children?
    Nguyen QD; Fusch G; Armbrust S; Jochum F; Fusch C
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Jun; 96(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 17537015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of growth in rural school children from Buenos Aires, Argentina using upper arm muscle area by height and other anthropometric dimensions of body composition.
    Bolzan A; Guimarey L; Frisancho AR
    Ann Hum Biol; 1999; 26(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 10195656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of thigh muscle and adipose tissue volume using magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry.
    Tothill P; Stewart AD
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Jul; 20(7):563-76. PubMed ID: 12166882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships between upper-arm anthropometry and soft-tissue composition in postmenopausal women.
    Reid IR; Evans MC; Ames R
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1992 Sep; 56(3):463-6. PubMed ID: 1503055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fat areas as estimates of total body fat.
    Himes JH; Roche AF; Webb P
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1980 Oct; 33(10):2093-100. PubMed ID: 7424806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.