These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33598123)

  • 1. Spatial capture-recapture with random thinning for unidentified encounters.
    Jiménez J; C Augustine B; Linden DW; B Chandler R; Royle JA
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 11(3):1187-1198. PubMed ID: 33598123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability.
    Ruprecht JS; Eriksson CE; Forrester TD; Clark DA; Wisdom MJ; Rowland MM; Johnson BK; Levi T
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02405. PubMed ID: 34245619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occupancy data improves parameter precision in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Jiménez J; Díaz-Ruiz F; Monterroso P; Tobajas J; Ferreras P
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9250. PubMed ID: 36052294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple observation processes in spatial capture-recapture models: How much do we gain?
    Tourani M; Dupont P; Nawaz MA; Bischof R
    Ecology; 2020 Jul; 101(7):e03030. PubMed ID: 32112415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.
    Carroll SL; Schmidt GM; Waller JS; Graves TA
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 38263096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrated animal movement and spatial capture-recapture models: Simulation, implementation, and inference.
    Gardner B; McClintock BT; Converse SJ; Hostetter NJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3771. PubMed ID: 35638187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized spatial mark-resight models with incomplete identification: An application to red fox density estimates.
    Jimenez J; Chandler R; Tobajas J; Descalzo E; Mateo R; Ferreras P
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Apr; 9(8):4739-4748. PubMed ID: 31031940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved methods for estimating abundance and related demographic parameters from mark-resight data.
    McClintock BT; White GC; Pryde MA
    Biometrics; 2019 Sep; 75(3):799-809. PubMed ID: 31004437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial capture-mark-resight estimation of animal population density.
    Efford MG; Hunter CM
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):411-420. PubMed ID: 28834536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.
    McClintock BT
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 5(21):4920-31. PubMed ID: 26640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models.
    Murphy SM; Wilckens DT; Augustine BC; Peyton MA; Harper GC
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4590. PubMed ID: 30872785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling spatiotemporal abundance and movement dynamics using an integrated spatial capture-recapture movement model.
    Hostetter NJ; Regehr EV; Wilson RR; Royle JA; Converse SJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3772. PubMed ID: 35633152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (
    Popescu VD; Iosif R; Pop MI; Chiriac S; Bouroș G; Furnas BJ
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(18):7134-7144. PubMed ID: 28944005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abundance estimation for line transect sampling: A comparison of distance sampling and spatial capture-recapture models.
    Crum NJ; Neyman LC; Gowan TA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252231. PubMed ID: 34048456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
    Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A flexible framework for spatial capture-recapture with unknown identities.
    van Dam-Bates P; Papathomas M; Stevenson BC; Fewster RM; Turek D; Stewart FEC; Borchers DL
    Biometrics; 2024 Jan; 80(1):. PubMed ID: 38372400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population.
    Kendall KC; Graves TA; Royle JA; Macleod AC; McKelvey KS; Boulanger J; Waller JS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16804. PubMed ID: 31727927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.