These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33598752)

  • 1. Liability for embryo mix-ups in fertility practices in the USA.
    Rasouli MA; Moutos CP; Phelps JY
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 May; 38(5):1101-1107. PubMed ID: 33598752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cryostorage failures: a medicolegal review.
    Moutos CP; Lahham R; Phelps JY
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1041-1048. PubMed ID: 31127476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Malpractice litigation surrounding in vitro fertilization in the United States: a legal literature review.
    Applebaum J; Humphries LA; Nepps ME; Berger DS; O'Neill K
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Apr; 119(4):572-580. PubMed ID: 36581015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Barcode tagging of human oocytes and embryos to prevent mix-ups in assisted reproduction technologies.
    Novo S; Nogués C; Penon O; Barrios L; Santaló J; Gómez-Martínez R; Esteve J; Errachid A; Plaza JA; Pérez-García L; Ibáñez E
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jan; 29(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 24227078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a systematic review of litigation in the face of new technology.
    Amagwula T; Chang PL; Hossain A; Tyner J; Rivers AL; Phelps JY
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1277-82. PubMed ID: 22901852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Jungheim ES; Ryan GL; Levens ED; Cunningham AF; Macones GA; Carson KR; Beltsos AN; Odem RR
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Sep; 94(4):1432-1436. PubMed ID: 19748089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
    JOINT SOGC-CFAS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Aug; 102(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18773532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The misplaced embryo: legal parenthood in 'embryo mix-up' cases.
    Simana S; Ravitsky V; Cohen IG
    J Med Ethics; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38050118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How compliant are in vitro fertilization member clinics in following embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 59,689 fresh first in vitro fertilization autologous cycles from 2011 to 2012.
    Keyhan S; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):645-652.e1. PubMed ID: 27268276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fabricated man: the dilemma posed by artificial reproductive techniques.
    Davies I
    North Irel Leg Q; 1984; 35(4):354-81. PubMed ID: 12186061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.
    White PM
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Apr; 34(4):431-443. PubMed ID: 28185120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(18):1-63. PubMed ID: 23074488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal aspects of ART practice in Israel.
    Schenker JG
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2003 Jul; 20(7):250-9. PubMed ID: 12921263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic witnessing in the medically assisted reproduction laboratory: insights and considerations after 10 years of use.
    Sterckx J; Wouters K; Mateizel I; Segers I; De Vos A; Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; De Munck N
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Aug; 38(8):1529-1537. PubMed ID: 37295967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debate in embryo donation: embryo donation or both-gamete donation?
    Samani RO; Moalem MR; Merghati ST; Alizadeh L
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2009; 19 Suppl 1():29-33. PubMed ID: 19622248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Single embryo transfer : impact of new Belgian legislation on the results of the Clinic of Fertility of the Erasme Hospital].
    Salame Y; Englert Y; Emiliani S; Revelard P; Delbaere A; Devreker F
    Rev Med Brux; 2007; 28(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17561721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National mosaic embryo transfer practices: a survey.
    Kim TG; Neblett MF; Shandley LM; Omurtag K; Hipp HS; Kawwass JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 219(6):602.e1-602.e7. PubMed ID: 30278174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lawsuit frequency and claims basis over lost, damaged, and destroyed frozen embryos over a 10-year period.
    Letterie G; Fox D
    F S Rep; 2020 Sep; 1(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 34223222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are you my parent? Are you my child? The role of genetics and race in defining relationships after reproductive technological mistakes.
    Liebler R
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2002; 5(1):15-56. PubMed ID: 14587480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.