These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33599601)

  • 1. The role of meta-analysis and preregistration in assessing the evidence for cleansing effects.
    Ross RM; van Aert RCM; van den Akker OR; van Elk M
    Behav Brain Sci; 2021 Feb; 44():e19. PubMed ID: 33599601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The lack of robust evidence for cleansing effects.
    Ropovik I; Sparacio A; IJzerman H
    Behav Brain Sci; 2021 Feb; 44():e18. PubMed ID: 33599586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming.
    van Elk M; Matzke D; Gronau QF; Guan M; Vandekerckhove J; Wagenmakers EJ
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1365. PubMed ID: 26441741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wipe it off: A meta-analytic review of the psychological consequences and antecedents of physical cleansing.
    Lee SWS; Chen K; Ma C; Hoang J
    Psychol Bull; 2024 Apr; 150(4):355-398. PubMed ID: 38358686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing dream to reality: an assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies.
    Claesen A; Gomes S; Tuerlinckx F; Vanpaemel W
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Oct; 8(10):211037. PubMed ID: 34729209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preregistration in practice: A comparison of preregistered and non-preregistered studies in psychology.
    van den Akker OR; van Assen MALM; Bakker M; Elsherif M; Wong TK; Wicherts JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37950113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence against subliminal anchoring: Two close, highly powered, preregistered, and failed replication attempts.
    Röseler L; Schütz A; Blank PA; Dück M; Fels S; Kupfer J; Scheelje L; Seida C
    J Exp Soc Psychol; 2021 Jan; 92():104066. PubMed ID: 33100377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations.
    Bakker M; Veldkamp CLS; van Assen MALM; Crompvoets EAV; Ong HH; Nosek BA; Soderberg CK; Mellor D; Wicherts JM
    PLoS Biol; 2020 Dec; 18(12):e3000937. PubMed ID: 33296358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preregistration in diverse contexts: a preregistration template for the application of cognitive models.
    Crüwell S; Evans NJ
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Oct; 8(10):210155. PubMed ID: 34659776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: an overview of reviews.
    Munder T; Brütsch O; Leonhart R; Gerger H; Barth J
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2013 Jun; 33(4):501-11. PubMed ID: 23500154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental antecedents of cleansing effects: Evidence against domain-generality.
    Gerdin E; Venkatesh S; Rottman J; DeJesus JM
    Behav Brain Sci; 2021 Feb; 44():e7. PubMed ID: 33599597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Soeken KL; Sripusanapan A
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 12552177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null.
    Ferguson CJ; Heene M
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 26168112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople's trust in researchers and research.
    Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):270-288. PubMed ID: 32036741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectations for Replications: Are Yours Realistic?
    Stanley DJ; Spence JR
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 9(3):305-18. PubMed ID: 26173266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Separation/connection procedures: From cleansing behavior to numerical cognition.
    Felisatti A; Fischer MH; Kulkova E; Kühne K; Michirev A
    Behav Brain Sci; 2021 Feb; 44():e5. PubMed ID: 33599596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From washing hands to washing consciences and polishing reputations.
    Légeret M; Hoffrage U
    Behav Brain Sci; 2021 Feb; 44():e15. PubMed ID: 33599589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.